Annoying Questions I'd Like Answered...
Moderator: Moderators
Should be (1/365)^24*(353/365)^50, since it's a 1/365 chance for each of those 24 exact numbers and a 353/365 chance of getting a 13-365 result on the last 50 rolls.
Edit: aaaaand ninja'd.
Edit: aaaaand ninja'd.
Last edited by Shiritai on Sun Aug 31, 2014 3:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
They are of course assuming that your rolls are ordered.
virgil wrote:Lovecraft didn't later add a love triangle between Dagon, Chtulhu, & the Colour-Out-of-Space; only to have it broken up through cyber-bullying by the King in Yellow.
FrankTrollman wrote:If your enemy is fucking Gravity, are you helping or hindering it by putting things on high shelves? I don't fucking know! That's not even a thing. Your enemy can't be Gravity, because that's stupid.
-
- Serious Badass
- Posts: 29894
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
If you don't care about the order, then multiply that probability byfbmf wrote:And if they aren't in any particular order?
Game On,
fbmf
74! / 50!
That is, multiply it by 74 * 73 * 72 * 71 * 70 * ... * 52 * 51 * 50. Which is approximately 10^53.
Edit: ninja'd. Frank, you don't need to worry about the 2^12 because the P(n,r) function handles that for you.
Last edited by Laertes on Sun Aug 31, 2014 2:10 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- momothefiddler
- Knight-Baron
- Posts: 883
- Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:55 am
- Location: United States
rolling 2,3,3 on a d6 is 1/6^3 ordered, and 3!/(6^3*2!) unordered because there are only 3 possible orderings of that, not 6.
My point is that you do need the 2^12. Oh no, a whole four orders of magnitude.
Also, I take it we're assuming this was a typo?
fbmf: when you say "fifty more results that are not those numbers", do you mean that none of those fifty rolls come up 1-12, or just that there are 50 more numbers you don't care about? Because these probabilities have all been assuming the former, and if it's okay to have at least two 4s rather than exactly two 4s, that increases the chances dramatically makes a minor change but leaves it essentially impossible wow my estimate was way off.
In any case, the answer is in the neighborhood of 10^-24.
My point is that you do need the 2^12. Oh no, a whole four orders of magnitude.
Also, I take it we're assuming this was a typo?
Because if not, it's (363^50*74!)/(365^74*50!*2^10*3) instead of (363^50*74!)/(365^74*50!*2^12)8,8,9,8,
fbmf: when you say "fifty more results that are not those numbers", do you mean that none of those fifty rolls come up 1-12, or just that there are 50 more numbers you don't care about? Because these probabilities have all been assuming the former, and if it's okay to have at least two 4s rather than exactly two 4s, that increases the chances dramatically makes a minor change but leaves it essentially impossible wow my estimate was way off.
In any case, the answer is in the neighborhood of 10^-24.
- momothefiddler
- Knight-Baron
- Posts: 883
- Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:55 am
- Location: United States
I think the interesting question is what are the odds, by sequence length, of a sequence of numbers where each number is equal to or one more than the previous number. Bonus credit if your solution is for an originally-unordered sequence.
Vebyast wrote:Here's a fun target for Major Creation: hydrazine. One casting every six seconds at CL9 gives you a bit more than 40 liters per second, which is comparable to the flow rates of some small, but serious, rocket engines. Six items running at full blast through a well-engineered engine will put you, and something like 50 tons of cargo, into space. Alternatively, if you thrust sideways, you will briefly be a fireball screaming across the sky at mach 14 before you melt from atmospheric friction.
- momothefiddler
- Knight-Baron
- Posts: 883
- Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:55 am
- Location: United States
Eh? Maybe I'm missing something, but at that point aren't you just asking the odds of a sequence that can be rearranged in ascending order?fectin wrote:I think the interesting question is what are the odds, by sequence length, of a sequence of numbers where each number is equal to or one more than the previous number. Bonus credit if your solution is for an originally-unordered sequence.
Also, do you have a die size in mind? Or an arbitrary-but-finite die size? If you just mean randomly selecting from all positive numbers, the answer is sort of 100%, but is actually "you can't do that".
Yes, but that's what fbmf was asking about (365 sides, rolled 74 times). Odds of a sequence in order are fairly easy, odds of an orderable sequence are rough.
Vebyast wrote:Here's a fun target for Major Creation: hydrazine. One casting every six seconds at CL9 gives you a bit more than 40 liters per second, which is comparable to the flow rates of some small, but serious, rocket engines. Six items running at full blast through a well-engineered engine will put you, and something like 50 tons of cargo, into space. Alternatively, if you thrust sideways, you will briefly be a fireball screaming across the sky at mach 14 before you melt from atmospheric friction.
- momothefiddler
- Knight-Baron
- Posts: 883
- Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:55 am
- Location: United States
I theorize that fbmf has discovered among a group of 74 people, that 24 of the birthdays are in pairs of 12 consecutive days that recently came to pass.
Incidentally, birthdays are not evenly distributed, here's a representation of US birthday stats
More people make babies at certain times and doctors avoid delivering on holidays (weekends too, but those roll around).
Incidentally, birthdays are not evenly distributed, here's a representation of US birthday stats
More people make babies at certain times and doctors avoid delivering on holidays (weekends too, but those roll around).
I wonder if it's superstition that causes the drop on the 13th?
I knew that there was a big jump in September, it causes there to be fewer holidays then historically.
I knew that there was a big jump in September, it causes there to be fewer holidays then historically.
virgil wrote:Lovecraft didn't later add a love triangle between Dagon, Chtulhu, & the Colour-Out-of-Space; only to have it broken up through cyber-bullying by the King in Yellow.
FrankTrollman wrote:If your enemy is fucking Gravity, are you helping or hindering it by putting things on high shelves? I don't fucking know! That's not even a thing. Your enemy can't be Gravity, because that's stupid.
Those spikes one week apart in April are representative of my person experience. Everyone I know with a birthday in April is on the 1st, 8th, 15th, and 24th. So not literally 1 week between, but that is how it is, and it's just weird.
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
-
- Serious Badass
- Posts: 29894
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
My sister and I are born on the same day in April and it is none of those days.Kaelik wrote:Those spikes one week apart in April are representative of my person experience. Everyone I know with a birthday in April is on the 1st, 8th, 15th, and 24th. So not literally 1 week between, but that is how it is, and it's just weird.
-Username17
A fellow educator in my game night group noticed it on her roster for the school year that just started. She asked aloud, "What are the odds?"erik wrote:I theorize that fbmf has discovered among a group of 74 people, that 24 of the birthdays are in pairs of 12 consecutive days that recently came to pass.
Game On,
fbmf
I mentioned this problem to the members of my gaming night last night and we were wondering about what the instigation of it was, actually. It's good to know.
I have heard, anecdotally, that clustered births can be tracked very accurately to unusually cold nights or power cuts nine months beforehand. If we were to dig up the meteorological and power data 283 days before those dates (that is, on 25 June or 2, 9 or 18 July) there might be a correlation.Kaelik wrote: Those spikes one week apart in April are representative of my person experience. Everyone I know with a birthday in April is on the 1st, 8th, 15th, and 24th. So not literally 1 week between, but that is how it is, and it's just weird.
My whole world is a lie! Also, you and your sister were born on the same day? Do you have a twin? Or did your parents have a very regular sex life?FrankTrollman wrote:My sister and I are born on the same day in April and it is none of those days.Kaelik wrote:Those spikes one week apart in April are representative of my person experience. Everyone I know with a birthday in April is on the 1st, 8th, 15th, and 24th. So not literally 1 week between, but that is how it is, and it's just weird.
-Username17
The people I know who were born in April are several years apart. So... nope.Laertes wrote:I have heard, anecdotally, that clustered births can be tracked very accurately to unusually cold nights or power cuts nine months beforehand. If we were to dig up the meteorological and power data 283 days before those dates (that is, on 25 June or 2, 9 or 18 July) there might be a correlation.
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
Is there any validity to this comparison of the types of food eaters in the world?
http://www.vegsource.com/articles2/anatomy_mills.htm
http://www.vegsource.com/articles2/anatomy_mills.htm
My son makes me laugh. Maybe he'll make you laugh, too.
- OgreBattle
- King
- Posts: 6820
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:33 am
-
- Serious Badass
- Posts: 29894
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
The Day the Earth Stood Still, 1951
Edit:
No. That is bizarre vegetarian propaganda. Whether animals have well developed jaw muscles or not has fuck-all to do with whether they are herbivores or carnivores, and everything to do with how tough the things they expect to be eating are. Creatures that eat shelled animals have monstrous jaw muscles, and creatures that eat soft fruit have weak jaw muscles. Creatures that eat soft flesh and leave bones have weak jaw muscles, and creatures that eat wood have powerful jaw muscles. Vitamin A is not binarily "detoxified" or not, there's a range below which you don't have enough and above which you have too much. Your body is able to metabolize and excrete vitamin A, so I have no idea what "cannot detoxify vitamin A" is supposed to mean in any context. All animals suffer hypervitaminosis A from some levels of vitamin A, whether they are carnivorous or not.Maj wrote:Is there any validity to this comparison of the types of food eaters in the world?
http://www.vegsource.com/articles2/anatomy_mills.htm
Every part of that chart is insane, and none of the claims made on any part of it are true. I wouldn't be at all surprised if the person credited with making it is either not a real doctor or doesn't even exist.
-Username17
Last edited by Username17 on Wed Sep 03, 2014 7:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.