Image macros that make you laugh, cry, or both.

Maj · Post by **Maj** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:22 am

Women use eReaders to hide the fact that they read romance (and dirtier) novels. Whether they're looked down upon or not is sort of secondary to women's embarrassment when caught with the stuff.

Koumei · Post by **Koumei** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:34 am

Chamomile wrote:What does bother me is when women point to a story that is clearly about an abusive relationship and saying that men should be like that.

Most women say they want a man who is willing to take risks, and willing to take control and make all the big decisions. Someone who likes to walk a lot and go outdoors a lot.

Basically, what they want is a rapist. (Alternatively: a serial killer)

(Thanks go to Jimmy Carr)

Stahlseele · Post by **Stahlseele** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:36 am

Prak_Anima wrote:
npc310 wrote:One difference is that Hustler has real people in it. 50 Shades and Twisparkle are fiction. I could be wrong, but neither of those books are autobiographical, but Hustler has actual photos of living people, and lots of them. That may be why you'd get dirty looks reading Hustler but not the others.

Another reason might be that 50 Shades is widely known as Mommy porn, and the Mommies are probably the ones who'd be giving you the dirty looks while you read the articles in Hustler in front of their kids in the neighborhood park. Yes, it's a double-standard.
Ok, then substitute Hustler with any of the many volumes of Penthouse letters that get published in actual book form, with no pictures (so far as I know) and possibly no more veracity then 50 Shades or Twilight.

Sad fact about the matter:
Many people would not know what these are to begin with and probably leave the reader alone . .

Prak · Post by **Prak** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:55 am

They might...

npc310 · Post by **npc310** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 8:33 am

Letters to Penthouse is still about real people. Some of it may be fantasy letters, but I would guess that the majority of the letters are from real people about their real thoughts and feelings.

More than that is probably the stereotype associated with Penthouse the magazine. That is, if the Soccer Moms know that Letters to Penthouse is associated with the skinmag, and not about postage to/from the resident of the top floor of a skyrise apartment building.

K · Post by K » Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:49 am

npc310 wrote:Letters to Penthouse is still about real people. Some of it may be fantasy letters, but I would guess that the majority of the letters are from real people about their real thoughts and feelings.

Clearly, you've never actually read a Penthouse letter.

Koumei · Post by **Koumei** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:52 am

I take it they're 130% pure fantasy?

K · Post by K » Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:59 am

In my experience, the number of women who enjoy unprotected, unlubricated, and surprise anal sex is a statistically insignificant number. It's porn-logic all the way and that's how you know that they are fabrications.

That casts about 95% of the letters in question. The other 5% about cheerleaders and naughty policewomen might be true, but I wouldn't bet on it.

Cynic · Post by **Cynic** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 12:57 pm

There's nothing fake about naughty policewomen and cheerleaders. That would destroy my reality.

Stahlseele · Post by **Stahlseele** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:40 pm

nothing to see here, carry on . .

Prak · Post by **Prak** » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:09 am

I'm just reminded of the time my character was pack alpha in WW and the pack was named Gaia's Avengers.

Ted the Flayer · Post by **Ted the Flayer** » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:36 am

K wrote:In my experience, the number of women who enjoy unprotected, unlubricated, and surprise anal sex is a statistically insignificant number.

wut?

Not that it's a statistically insignificant number, only that npcwhatever thought that really happened.

hyzmarca · Post by **hyzmarca** » Wed Jul 25, 2012 2:37 pm

Koumei wrote:
Chamomile wrote:What does bother me is when women point to a story that is clearly about an abusive relationship and saying that men should be like that.
Most women say they want a man who is willing to take risks, and willing to take control and make all the big decisions. Someone who likes to walk a lot and go outdoors a lot.

Basically, what they want is a rapist. (Alternatively: a serial killer)

(Thanks go to Jimmy Carr)

Really, they want Indiana Jones, or Han Solo, or Jack Ryan, or Rick Deckard. Really, any character played by Harrison Ford will do.

Strong but vulnerable, sensitive and poetic under that strong violent exterior.

sabs · Post by **sabs** » Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:03 pm

Maybe they just want Harrison Ford?
Just saying

Grek · Post by **Grek** » Wed Jul 25, 2012 6:03 pm

If I were a woman, I would want Harrison Ford. So there is a certain appeal to that line of reasoning.

Korgan0 · Post by **Korgan0** » Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:42 pm

Hell, I kinda want Harrison Ford and I'm a straight man.

ckafrica · Post by **ckafrica** » Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:02 pm

Apparently straight men want shemales or so says science (google talks0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-A8GvUe ... r_embedded

Prak · Post by **Prak** » Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:22 pm

hyzmarca wrote:
Koumei wrote:
Chamomile wrote:What does bother me is when women point to a story that is clearly about an abusive relationship and saying that men should be like that.
Most women say they want a man who is willing to take risks, and willing to take control and make all the big decisions. Someone who likes to walk a lot and go outdoors a lot.

Basically, what they want is a rapist. (Alternatively: a serial killer)

(Thanks go to Jimmy Carr)
Really, they want Indiana Jones, or Han Solo, or Jack Ryan, or Rick Deckard. Really, any character played by Harrison Ford will do.

Strong but vulnerable, sensitive and poetic under that strong violent exterior.

Oh they say they do, but if you shoot a bunch of people, then grab them and kiss them, they get all angry and shit, and you say "But I'm just being Harrison Ford!" and they start hitting you, and you have to shoot them, and then you grab another, and the whole thing starts all over again, and, well, my point is, who wants to help me hide a hundred bodies?

Ted the Flayer · Post by **Ted the Flayer** » Thu Jul 26, 2012 4:06 am

Let me find my fork...

Ted the Flayer · Post by **Ted the Flayer** » Thu Jul 26, 2012 4:49 am

I don't know if this counts as an image macro, but from what I've heard, this is 100% legit:

www.poopsenders.com

You pay them money, and they will anonymously send poop to anyone you tell them to...

Prak · Post by **Prak** » Thu Jul 26, 2012 4:59 am

In your choice of type and amount, even. Welcome to America, where we will find a way to make money out of fucking anything.

I don't want to know how you found this, Ted.

....though I may have business for them.

Avoraciopoctules · Post by **Avoraciopoctules** » Thu Jul 26, 2012 7:08 am

K · Post by K » Thu Jul 26, 2012 11:36 am

Nice.

Dr_Noface · Post by **Dr_Noface** » Thu Jul 26, 2012 12:38 pm

Love it. Do you know where that art is from?

erik · Post by **erik** » Thu Jul 26, 2012 7:13 pm

Dr_Noface wrote:Love it. Do you know where that art is from?

I used tineye.com

[spoilar, it is a magic the gathering card]
http://gatherer.wizards.com/Handlers/Im ... s&options=

http://www.wizards.com/magic/magazine/a ... ilc-mtgrss

[edit:] oh, and the artist's site is here. http://www.kekaiart.com/
very nice work there