[Dom3] ANOTHER newbie game - MA, [5/5] - In progress

DSMatticus · Post by **DSMatticus** » Fri May 25, 2012 1:31 am

Greetings, Mictlan. Would you be interested in an NAP-3?

Zinegata · Post by **Zinegata** » Fri May 25, 2012 2:48 am

Mister_Sinister wrote:These random events are fucking me off. First a plague kills half my cap population, then I get a necromancer attacking me. Yeah, Dom3 logic again.

If you don't have Misfortune scales you have my sympathies. If you do however, then that's the price of Misfortune

.

DSMatticus · Post by **DSMatticus** » Fri May 25, 2012 4:00 am

Zinegata wrote:
Mister_Sinister wrote:These random events are fucking me off. First a plague kills half my cap population, then I get a necromancer attacking me. Yeah, Dom3 logic again.
If you don't have Misfortune scales you have my sympathies. If you do however, then that's the price of Misfortune .

He mentioned his scales already. O3D3L1, I think.

Archmage · Post by **Archmage** » Sat May 26, 2012 2:05 am

Machaka seems to have staled last turn.

Everything okay over there?

koz · Post by **koz** » Sat May 26, 2012 3:12 am

Fuckity fuckstar. That's what I get for having an AI report to do. Would you be OK with a do-over?

Archmage · Post by **Archmage** » Sat May 26, 2012 3:25 am

I'd rather not, but if it's cool with other people I'm not going to object, especially since I'm sure that stale really hurt you and I don't want to see you lose interest in the game or go AI.

DSMatticus · Post by **DSMatticus** » Sat May 26, 2012 3:36 am

I haven't even looked at the new turn yet, and mitigating some of the ridiculous screwage that has happened since the restart (probabilitistically, I absolve myself of all guilt! The conditional probability of <bad shit> was totally independent of the restart!) might be worthwhile. As a general rule, it's kind of bad practice, but so was the restart and this game has been mf'ing ridiculous anyway.

I have no strong feelings one way or another.

Archmage · Post by **Archmage** » Sat May 26, 2012 3:47 am

My only request is that if there is a rollback that the next turn not be due until...6 AM GMT on Sunday? I have no idea what is going to happen with regards to the turn schedule if we do a rollback and I will be at work until 3 AM GMT or so.

Edit: I realize that it seems silly for me to "request" that when I am the one with the admin password, but I'm not the only one with the admin password because I'm not going to be around to implement any decisions made in the next 18+ hours.

DSMatticus · Post by **DSMatticus** » Sat May 26, 2012 6:07 am

I've forgotten how to count NAP's. Assume you break an NAP on turn 13. Does that mean:
Turn 13: Peace
Turn 14: Peace
Turn 15: Peace
Turn 16: Orders to attack.
Turn 17: Attacks land.
?

Edit: NAP-3. Should specify that.

Korwin · Post by **Korwin** » Sat May 26, 2012 8:22 am

I would count thus:
13: the other gets the chancelation (and has time to change his orders) - peace
14: peace
15: orders to attack, but still no fights - peace
16: war

Archmage · Post by **Archmage** » Sat May 26, 2012 2:50 pm

FYI, I gave myself a six hour extension. Next hosting is at 0700 GMT on Sunday the 27th.

Orion · Post by **Orion** » Sat May 26, 2012 4:37 pm

I don't have to resumbit my orders, right?

Archmage · Post by **Archmage** » Sat May 26, 2012 5:11 pm

Server says no 2h file has been received for Shinuyama. So yeah, you'll have to submit orders for turn 8, which is being replayed.

That goes for everyone but C'tis, who has already submitted their turn.

Also, Mictlan agrees to an NAP-3 with Ashdod.

Archmage · Post by **Archmage** » Sun May 27, 2012 2:29 am

I submitted my turn and then postponed hosting because I really don't want Shinuyama to stale:

Llamaserver wrote:Hosting postponed for DenNoobsTwo by 12 hours. The game will now host at 19:48 GMT on Sunday May 27th.
Please note that this information will not be updated on the game status page for a few minutes.

So, uh, submit your turn, dude!

Orion · Post by **Orion** » Sun May 27, 2012 3:07 pm

When you rollback a turn, the server will say 2h not received, but if you host it will use the old 2h file if there hasn't been a replacement.

Archmage · Post by **Archmage** » Sun May 27, 2012 4:03 pm

Oh. That's good to know. In that case, every player has submitted a turn and I'll force hosting.

koz · Post by **koz** » Mon May 28, 2012 4:42 am

O hai dere, Sheeenuyahmah. As a token of friendship and good will, we'll let you have provinces 76 and 64. We want to lay claim to 69 and 52. Hope that's all good.

We would also like to announce that we are open for business, and will make Dwarven Hammers for discerning customers. We prefer payment in Death gems, but we can negotiate.

Drago0661 · Post by **Drago0661** » Mon May 28, 2012 5:12 am

[SV]

Greetingssss Machaka,

We would like to take your offer for a dwarven hammer.

We currently have water, death and nature gemssss. What quantity are you looking to sell a hammer for?

Greetingssss also to Shinyuama,

How would you like to negotiate borderssss?

[/SV]

DSMatticus · Post by **DSMatticus** » Mon May 28, 2012 5:23 am

@C'tis, you've also ran into Ashdod this turn, it seems. We're interested in everything to the east of the wraparound (including 23), but otherwise no further. Unless your capital is in 16 or something, in which case we'll have to think a little harder about where to draw the border.

koz · Post by **koz** » Mon May 28, 2012 7:04 am

15 Death gems and it's all yours.

Drago0661 · Post by **Drago0661** » Mon May 28, 2012 11:25 am

DSMatticus wrote:@C'tis, you've also ran into Ashdod this turn, it seems. We're interested in everything to the east of the wraparound (including 23), but otherwise no further. Unless your capital is in 16 or something, in which case we'll have to think a little harder about where to draw the border.

[SV]

Greetingsss Ashdod

We are perfectly happy with thissss border arrangement, and we would like to offer an NAP-3 along with thissss arrangement.

[/SV]

Mister_Sinister wrote:15 Death gems and it's all yours.

[SV]

Then we have ourselvessss a deal Machaka. Please let ussss know then turn you are sending the hammer and we will send the 15 death gemssss on the same turn.

[/SV]

DSMatticus · Post by **DSMatticus** » Mon May 28, 2012 5:49 pm

Drago wrote:We are perfectly happy with thissss border arrangement, and we would like to offer an NAP-3 along with thissss arrangement.

Deal and deal.

Orion · Post by **Orion** » Tue May 29, 2012 2:15 am

Machaka-- those borders are acceptable.

Ctis: I want provinces 8 and 9, but you can have 11 and 5. Deal?

koz · Post by **koz** » Tue May 29, 2012 3:17 am

C'tis: Your hammer is being forged this turn. If you wanna send the gems next turn, we'll send you the hammer.

I may want to add that we can, and will, craft almost any item with Const 2 as a requirement. We take payment in Death gems, but if the item needs a type of gem we lack, we need the resources too.

Drago0661 · Post by **Drago0661** » Tue May 29, 2012 5:04 am

Orion wrote: Ctis: I want provinces 8 and 9, but you can have 11 and 5. Deal?

[SV]

We already control 11, and 5 is a swamp.

You can have 9, we would like 5 and 8. Unlesssss of course you would like to compromise?

[/SV]

Edit:

[SV]

Greetingssss Mictlan,

I assume that we can keep our borderssss assss they are, we would like to offer an NAP-3 assss well.

[/SV]