Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2017 3:41 pm
IQs are a lot like dicks, if someone tells you about theirs on the Internet they're exaggerating.
No, you don't. The tests can't reliably measure past about 140, which is about what Stephen Hawkings is.Shrapnel wrote:I have an IQ of 170, tested in high school.
Bingo.Pseudo Stupidity wrote:IQs are a lot like dicks, if someone tells you about theirs on the Internet they're exaggerating.
First, IQ is not standardized. Some tests have a standard deviation every 15 points, some have it every 20. Also, they adjust test results based on the age of the one taking the test. So, if Shrapnel took it while in high school, the IQ they would give him would be higher than what an adult who gave the same answers would get.SlyJohnny wrote:No, you don't. The tests can't reliably measure past about 140, which is about what Stephen Hawkings is.Shrapnel wrote:I have an IQ of 170, tested in high school.
"I'd love to see SCOTUS give him the extremely rare, but beautiful, collective nine middle finger response."
"Eight."
"Ginsburg will be using both hands."
What percentage of Americans want a universal healthcare system at free/very low cost for users?
Free stuff? I assume everyone wants that.
The real question is, how many Americans want to pay for that free stuff?
If you think healthcare is expensive now, just wait until you see how expensive it is when it is free.
Fuck republicans so much.OgreBattle wrote:What percentage of Americans want a universal healthcare system at free/very low cost for users?
Free stuff? I assume everyone wants that.
The real question is, how many Americans want to pay for that free stuff?
If you think healthcare is expensive now, just wait until you see how expensive it is when it is free.
I retired an assassin once by using a hat of disguises and then assassinating the party, who had bullied my character for years. The sheer satisfaction of walking away with all their precious items was gold. That was also the last time I gamed with that group of power players.
Being a fiscal conservative means understanding that people have to pay for what they get. There is no bottomless bag of money to spread around. That means not everybody gets what they want - including food, housing and medical care.
.... Did you miss the part where he defended pedophilia?Grek wrote:Yes, because the problem with Milo is definitely that he's gay. And because gay people are all pedophiles. That's definitely the track you want to go with.
He didn't just defend it, he advocated for it.Kaelik wrote:.... Did you miss the part where he defended pedophilia?Grek wrote:Yes, because the problem with Milo is definitely that he's gay. And because gay people are all pedophiles. That's definitely the track you want to go with.
He defended pedophiles, and said he wasn't personally a victim, that's not the same as advocating for it.Maxus wrote:He didn't just defend it, he advocated for it.Kaelik wrote:.... Did you miss the part where he defended pedophilia?Grek wrote:Yes, because the problem with Milo is definitely that he's gay. And because gay people are all pedophiles. That's definitely the track you want to go with.
My penis is 40075.62km. The Norse called it the Jörmungandr.Pseudo Stupidity wrote:IQs are a lot like dicks, if someone tells you about theirs on the Internet they're exaggerating.
Yes. Yes I did. Complaint withdrawn.Kaelik wrote:.... Did you miss the part where he defended pedophilia?
I think it's sad that a slimy hatepeddler like Milo only got in trouble because he stumbled into a taboo like a dumbass. I also find it disturbing that americans paint sex with teenagers as "pedophilia"; it's at the same time deeply troubling in how it denies reality, and in how it cheapens how fucking horrible actual pedophilia is.Kaelik wrote:.... Did you miss the part where he defended pedophilia?Grek wrote:Yes, because the problem with Milo is definitely that he's gay. And because gay people are all pedophiles. That's definitely the track you want to go with.
I mean there are definitely issues where republicans went super harder on him for this than everything else he said, almost like they believed everything he said all along, and then believed him when he said this, but were totally fine with the racism, but not fine with the men having sex with young boys thing.
But to claim that someone is only making jokes about a guy who literally defended pedophiles being a pedophile because "all gays are pedophiles" is pretty disingenuous.
Many of the practical reasons to condemn pedophilia are still present when talking about teenagers closer to the legal age of consent. The practical power disparity and relative naivety and impressionability of the younger party do not lend themselves to a situation where all parties are in an equal position to refuse. It's not a recipe for a healthy situation.rasmuswagner wrote:I think it's sad that a slimy hatepeddler like Milo only got in trouble because he stumbled into a taboo like a dumbass. I also find it disturbing that americans paint sex with teenagers as "pedophilia"; it's at the same time deeply troubling in how it denies reality, and in how it cheapens how fucking horrible actual pedophilia is.Kaelik wrote:.... Did you miss the part where he defended pedophilia?Grek wrote:Yes, because the problem with Milo is definitely that he's gay. And because gay people are all pedophiles. That's definitely the track you want to go with.
I mean there are definitely issues where republicans went super harder on him for this than everything else he said, almost like they believed everything he said all along, and then believed him when he said this, but were totally fine with the racism, but not fine with the men having sex with young boys thing.
But to claim that someone is only making jokes about a guy who literally defended pedophiles being a pedophile because "all gays are pedophiles" is pretty disingenuous.