The Gaming Den Forum Index The Gaming Den
Welcome to the Gaming Den.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Google
 Search WWW   Search tgdmb.com 
Quotes 2017
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Gaming Den Forum Index -> MPSIMS
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Pseudo Stupidity
Knight-Baron


Joined: 02 Sep 2011
Posts: 849

PostPosted: Sat Mar 18, 2017 3:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

IQs are a lot like dicks, if someone tells you about theirs on the Internet they're exaggerating.
_________________
Click here to see the hidden message (It might contain spoilers)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SlyJohnny
Knight-Baron


Joined: 23 Jan 2012
Posts: 941

PostPosted: Sat Mar 18, 2017 3:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

Shrapnel wrote:
I have an IQ of 170, tested in high school.


No, you don't. The tests can't reliably measure past about 140, which is about what Stephen Hawkings is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Shrapnel
Prince


Joined: 06 Jan 2012
Posts: 2656
Location: Ho-hum diggidy dum

PostPosted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 12:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

Pseudo Stupidity wrote:
IQs are a lot like dicks, if someone tells you about theirs on the Internet they're exaggerating.


Bingo.
_________________
"Keep Calm and Freak the Fuck Out"

Click here to see the hidden message (It might contain spoilers)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TiaC
Knight-Baron


Joined: 20 Jun 2013
Posts: 914

PostPosted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 9:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

SlyJohnny wrote:
Shrapnel wrote:
I have an IQ of 170, tested in high school.


No, you don't. The tests can't reliably measure past about 140, which is about what Stephen Hawkings is.


First, IQ is not standardized. Some tests have a standard deviation every 15 points, some have it every 20. Also, they adjust test results based on the age of the one taking the test. So, if Shrapnel took it while in high school, the IQ they would give him would be higher than what an adult who gave the same answers would get.
_________________
virgil wrote:
Lovecraft didn't later add a love triangle between Dagon, Chtulhu, & the Colour-Out-of-Space; only to have it broken up through cyber-bullying by the King in Yellow.

FrankTrollman wrote:
If your enemy is fucking Gravity, are you helping or hindering it by putting things on high shelves? I don't fucking know! That's not even a thing. Your enemy can't be Gravity, because that's stupid.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
angelfromanotherpin
King


Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 7424

PostPosted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 3:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

Quote:
"I'd love to see SCOTUS give him the extremely rare, but beautiful, collective nine middle finger response."

"Eight."

"Ginsburg will be using both hands."

_________________
"Now that we've determined that up to π angels can dance on the head of a pin, how do we determine the specific number (or fraction) of angels dancing?"
"What if angels from another pin engage them in melee combat?"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Josh_Kablack
Prince


Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 4980
Location: Online. duh

PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 3:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

An exchange between my 5-year old nephew and his father:

"So humiliating"

"What is, kiddo?"

"I don't even know what humiliating means."
_________________
Johnson - Hanks 2020
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
OgreBattle
King


Joined: 03 Sep 2011
Posts: 5083

PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2017 11:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

Quote:

What percentage of Americans want a universal healthcare system at free/very low cost for users?

Free stuff? I assume everyone wants that.

The real question is, how many Americans want to pay for that free stuff?

If you think healthcare is expensive now, just wait until you see how expensive it is when it is free.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage


Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 12079

PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2017 1:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

OgreBattle wrote:
Quote:

What percentage of Americans want a universal healthcare system at free/very low cost for users?

Free stuff? I assume everyone wants that.

The real question is, how many Americans want to pay for that free stuff?

If you think healthcare is expensive now, just wait until you see how expensive it is when it is free.


Fuck republicans so much.

Spoiler alert, the bottom fucking 60% that would be paying less than they are now would be fucking thrilled to pay for it.

We get it, you rich assholes would rather sit on slightly larger piles of money at the cost of murdering people, stop lying about how poor people would have to pay for it.
_________________
"DSMatticus" wrote:
Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
Click here to see the hidden message (It might contain spoilers)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
OgreBattle
King


Joined: 03 Sep 2011
Posts: 5083

PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2017 8:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

Quote:
I retired an assassin once by using a hat of disguises and then assassinating the party, who had bullied my character for years. The sheer satisfaction of walking away with all their precious items was gold. That was also the last time I gamed with that group of power players.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
OgreBattle
King


Joined: 03 Sep 2011
Posts: 5083

PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 11:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

Quote:
Being a fiscal conservative means understanding that people have to pay for what they get. There is no bottomless bag of money to spread around. That means not everybody gets what they want - including food, housing and medical care.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MGuy
Prince


Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Posts: 3418
Location: Indiana

PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 11:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

If only 'fiscal conservatives' were better at deciding which people got what they wanted we wouldn't have to sacrifice food, housing, or healthcare.
_________________
The first rule of Fatclub. Don't Talk about Fatclub..
I've always thought it best to never hit a lady, but be sure to beat a bitch. -TOZ
MGuy wrote:
Finally a thread about fighters!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
Shrapnel
Prince


Joined: 06 Jan 2012
Posts: 2656
Location: Ho-hum diggidy dum

PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 12:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

An exchange from work today...

A customer: "You know who I am, right?"

Me: "Uh..."

Customer: "I'm [a co-workers] husband..."

Me: "Oh, yeah, I remember."

Customer: "...and you just charged me for a coffee."

Me: "Well, you're not my husband."
_________________
"Keep Calm and Freak the Fuck Out"

Click here to see the hidden message (It might contain spoilers)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
OgreBattle
King


Joined: 03 Sep 2011
Posts: 5083

PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 5:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

On a question of "What would you tweet if you could control Donald Trump's twitter":

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Grek
Prince


Joined: 11 Jan 2009
Posts: 2611

PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 6:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

Yes, because the problem with Milo is definitely that he's gay. And because gay people are all pedophiles. That's definitely the track you want to go with.

DISREGARD THIS I SUCK COCKS
_________________
Quote:
But more importantly if you elevate jerkishness into a principle, if you try to undermine the rules that keep niceness, community, and civilization going, the defenses against social cancer – then your movement will fracture, it will be hugely embarrassing, the atmosphere will become toxic, unpopular people will be thrown to the mob, everyone but the thickest-skinned will bow out, and the people you need to convince will view you with a mixture of terror and loathing.


Last edited by Grek on Mon Apr 03, 2017 6:50 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage


Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 12079

PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 6:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

Grek wrote:
Yes, because the problem with Milo is definitely that he's gay. And because gay people are all pedophiles. That's definitely the track you want to go with.


.... Did you miss the part where he defended pedophilia?

I mean there are definitely issues where republicans went super harder on him for this than everything else he said, almost like they believed everything he said all along, and then believed him when he said this, but were totally fine with the racism, but not fine with the men having sex with young boys thing.

But to claim that someone is only making jokes about a guy who literally defended pedophiles being a pedophile because "all gays are pedophiles" is pretty disingenuous.
_________________
"DSMatticus" wrote:
Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
Click here to see the hidden message (It might contain spoilers)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
DSMatticus
Prince


Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Posts: 4942

PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 6:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

How the hell did you miss that giant news cycle when Milo's career crashed and burned because he defended pedophilia and shamed victims thereof for outing their abusers? I think it's the most attention Milo's ever gotten.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Maxus
Overlord


Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 7630

PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 6:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

Kaelik wrote:
Grek wrote:
Yes, because the problem with Milo is definitely that he's gay. And because gay people are all pedophiles. That's definitely the track you want to go with.


.... Did you miss the part where he defended pedophilia?


He didn't just defend it, he advocated for it.
_________________
He jumps like a damned dragoon, and charges into battle fighting rather insane monsters with little more than his bare hands and rather nasty spell effects conjured up solely through knowledge and the local plantlife. He unerringly knows where his goal lies, he breathes underwater and is untroubled by space travel, seems to have no limits to his actual endurance and favors killing his enemies by driving both boots square into their skull. His agility is unmatched, and his strength legendary, able to fling about a turtle shell big enough to contain a man with enough force to barrel down a near endless path of unfortunates.

--The horror of Mario

Zak S, Zak Smith, Dndwithpornstars, Zak Sabbath. He is a terrible person and a hack at writing and art. His cultural contributions are less than Justin Bieber's, and he's a shitmuffin. Go go gadget Googlebomb!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage


Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 12079

PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 7:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

Maxus wrote:
Kaelik wrote:
Grek wrote:
Yes, because the problem with Milo is definitely that he's gay. And because gay people are all pedophiles. That's definitely the track you want to go with.


.... Did you miss the part where he defended pedophilia?


He didn't just defend it, he advocated for it.


He defended pedophiles, and said he wasn't personally a victim, that's not the same as advocating for it.
_________________
"DSMatticus" wrote:
Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
Click here to see the hidden message (It might contain spoilers)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
hyzmarca
Prince


Joined: 14 Mar 2011
Posts: 3432

PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 9:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

Pseudo Stupidity wrote:
IQs are a lot like dicks, if someone tells you about theirs on the Internet they're exaggerating.


My penis is 40075.62km. The Norse called it the Jörmungandr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Grek
Prince


Joined: 11 Jan 2009
Posts: 2611

PostPosted: Mon Apr 03, 2017 6:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

Kaelik wrote:
.... Did you miss the part where he defended pedophilia?
Yes. Yes I did. Complaint withdrawn.
_________________
Quote:
But more importantly if you elevate jerkishness into a principle, if you try to undermine the rules that keep niceness, community, and civilization going, the defenses against social cancer – then your movement will fracture, it will be hugely embarrassing, the atmosphere will become toxic, unpopular people will be thrown to the mob, everyone but the thickest-skinned will bow out, and the people you need to convince will view you with a mixture of terror and loathing.


Last edited by Grek on Mon Apr 03, 2017 6:49 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ancient History
Invincible Overlord


Joined: 18 Aug 2010
Posts: 11328

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 2:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

"[Trump] saw Obama and assumed it was so easy a black man could do it."
_________________
The Unpublishable - Updates Fridays between midnight and midnight | http://wikithulhu.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rasmuswagner
Knight-Baron


Joined: 16 May 2011
Posts: 615
Location: Danmark

PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2017 3:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

Kaelik wrote:
Grek wrote:
Yes, because the problem with Milo is definitely that he's gay. And because gay people are all pedophiles. That's definitely the track you want to go with.


.... Did you miss the part where he defended pedophilia?

I mean there are definitely issues where republicans went super harder on him for this than everything else he said, almost like they believed everything he said all along, and then believed him when he said this, but were totally fine with the racism, but not fine with the men having sex with young boys thing.

But to claim that someone is only making jokes about a guy who literally defended pedophiles being a pedophile because "all gays are pedophiles" is pretty disingenuous.


I think it's sad that a slimy hatepeddler like Milo only got in trouble because he stumbled into a taboo like a dumbass. I also find it disturbing that americans paint sex with teenagers as "pedophilia"; it's at the same time deeply troubling in how it denies reality, and in how it cheapens how fucking horrible actual pedophilia is.
_________________
Every time you play in a "low magic world" with D&D rules (or derivates), a unicorn steps on a kitten and an orphan drops his ice cream cone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Omegonthesane
Duke


Joined: 26 Sep 2009
Posts: 1989

PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2017 4:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

rasmuswagner wrote:
Kaelik wrote:
Grek wrote:
Yes, because the problem with Milo is definitely that he's gay. And because gay people are all pedophiles. That's definitely the track you want to go with.


.... Did you miss the part where he defended pedophilia?

I mean there are definitely issues where republicans went super harder on him for this than everything else he said, almost like they believed everything he said all along, and then believed him when he said this, but were totally fine with the racism, but not fine with the men having sex with young boys thing.

But to claim that someone is only making jokes about a guy who literally defended pedophiles being a pedophile because "all gays are pedophiles" is pretty disingenuous.


I think it's sad that a slimy hatepeddler like Milo only got in trouble because he stumbled into a taboo like a dumbass. I also find it disturbing that americans paint sex with teenagers as "pedophilia"; it's at the same time deeply troubling in how it denies reality, and in how it cheapens how fucking horrible actual pedophilia is.

Many of the practical reasons to condemn pedophilia are still present when talking about teenagers closer to the legal age of consent. The practical power disparity and relative naivety and impressionability of the younger party do not lend themselves to a situation where all parties are in an equal position to refuse. It's not a recipe for a healthy situation.
_________________
FrankTrollman wrote:
And if there are any weeds that grow better in barren soil than laziness and ignorance, I don't know what they are (and don't care enough to find out).
Kaelik wrote:
Because powerful men get away with terrible shit, and even the public domain ones get ignored, and then, when the floodgates open, it turns out there was a goddam flood behind it.
FrankTrollman wrote:
As far as death and human misery goes, Tobacco is basically World War II grinding on forever with no real sign of stopping in our life times. Death camps and nuclear bombs and stuff are certainly dramatic, but public health crises are always and forever bigger than wars on the global scale.


Zak S, Zak Smith, Dndwithpornstars, Zak Sabbath. He is a terrible person and a hack at writing and art. His cultural contributions are less than Justin Bieber's, and he's a shitmuffin. Go go gadget Googlebomb!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DSMatticus
Prince


Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Posts: 4942

PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2017 5:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

Hey, if you're an adult, don't fuck thirteen-year-olds. This is not a complicated topic. No, they are not basically adults. No, their sexual development does not make them fair game. Especially don't go on internet forums whining about how people who are offended by adults fucking thirteen-year-olds are cheapening the horror of "actual" pedophilia. Definitely do not join Milo in insinuating that catholic priests are doing a service to the gay community by teaching thirteen-year-olds how to give head. Quibbling between pedophilia and hebephilia is a matter of academic interest; yes, they are different, and yes, they are plausibly entirely different psychological mechanisms or at the very least distinct manifestations of the same underlying mechanism, and that's probably worth understanding. But the ethical imperatives in each case are very clear and not up for debate. No the thirteen-year-old cannot give meaningful consent and yes you can really fuck up their life so put your dick back in your pants you creepy asshole end of discussion.

The band covered by ephebophilia already stretches past the age of consent. No, you shouldn't be fucking highschool freshmen. Highschool freshmen are still stupid and have zero relationships of equal-power with adults and as such there is basically a 0% chance that what you're doing begins to even look defensible and a 99% chance you're a person in a position of authority deliberately or unthinkingly preying on someone who cannot realistically say no without consequences or at least without fearing potential consequences. But college freshmen specifically do not have any inequal relationships that the rest of us adults don't also have, and any scummy bullshit you could do to sleep with one is the same kind of scummy bullshit you could do to anyone else. We have to set the line somewhere, and the place where you start adopting the responsibility of managing your own life and stop being expected to unconditionally obey authority figures is probably a good point for it. And then not sending hischool seniors to prison for sleeping with highschool juniors and shit like that are good common-sense adjustments to the system. Those two kinds of people are going to have a lot of social overlap and don't have particularly inequal relationships and there's no point ruining anyone's life over that.


Last edited by DSMatticus on Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:16 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lord Mistborn
Duke


Joined: 12 Aug 2012
Posts: 1345

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2017 5:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List

"when you think about it aren’t all pregnant women cucked into raising another man’s child? if they had any self-respect they’d undergo parthenogenesis"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Gaming Den Forum Index -> MPSIMS All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group