So how are there non-believers in STAR WARS?

General questions, debates, and rants about RPGs

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
fbmf
The Great Fence Builder
Posts: 2590
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

So how are there non-believers in STAR WARS?

Post by fbmf »

Anybody alive in the Core Worlds during the Rise of the Empire presumably saw Jedi (via Holovids if nothing else) doing a bunch of crazy Jedi shit, but in Ep IV Admiral Motti and Han Solo express disbelief in the Force.

How is that reasonable?

Game On,
fbmf
User avatar
OgreBattle
King
Posts: 6820
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:33 am

Post by OgreBattle »

George Lucas didn't think that far ahead.
User avatar
shadzar
Prince
Posts: 4922
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:08 pm

Post by shadzar »

because it was a religion based on worshiping bacteria.

even when he saw it what was it he said about the force to Vader? (dont feel like digging the DVDs out)

what was it Han said... "hockey religions and..."

Han didnt believe it had power over him (maybe he wasnt weak willed for Jedi mind tricks to work on him)

dont forget ep 1 "im a tridarian, mind tricks dont work on me. only money". does that mean he didnt believe in the force, or thought it was not a real religion?

i will also enjoy the back and forth on this one between fbmf and k as well. going to make some popcorn now to prepare for it. :)
Play the game, not the rules.
Swordslinger wrote:Or fuck it... I'm just going to get weapon specialization in my cock and whip people to death with it. Given all the enemies are total pussies, it seems like the appropriate thing to do.
Lewis Black wrote:If the people of New Zealand want to be part of our world, I believe they should hop off their islands, and push 'em closer.
good read (Note to self Maxus sucks a barrel of cocks.)
User avatar
angelfromanotherpin
Overlord
Posts: 9745
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by angelfromanotherpin »

The extermination of the Jedi seems to have made everyone very skeptical about the usefulness of their abilities and the validity of their beliefs. No-one denies that Vader can crush your throat with his mind, or is surprised by it happening – Motti's criticism was that Vader's powers hadn't been able to actually accomplish any stated goals (find the plans, find the rebel base) and was perfectly correct. Similarly, Han's 'hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side' quote doesn't deny that the Jedi have abilities, only that in a fight he'd prefer a gun, and as much as I hate referencing the prequels, in Ep3 the Jedi were killed with guns. Han also disbelieves 'that there's some all-powerful Force controlling everything,' but this is entirely coherent with observed evidence, since even the most powerful force-users have some pretty sharp limits on what they can actually do.
User avatar
Juton
Duke
Posts: 1415
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 3:08 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by Juton »

I would presume the Galactic Empire made a lot of propaganda about the Jedi. During the Republic the Jedi where probably seen as benevolent, you have to do a lot of spin to justify why you crushed a benevolent group like the Jedi. As part of that propaganda they probably downplayed what Jedi where really capable of and over represented any rituals or traditions the order had to make them seem strange and unrelatable to the public. The Sith would also want the public/potential enemies to be unaware of what powers they truly possessed, so would suppress that information.
Oh thank God, finally a thread about how Fighters in D&D suck. This was a long time coming. - Schwarzkopf
K
King
Posts: 6487
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by K »

Anyone capable of using the Force is an extremely tiny proportion of the population (a hundred in a nation of billions), meaning that most people could easily see all the beliefs of the Jedi as mere superstition around a super-rare talent. The fact that those teachings offer nothing to someone without the extremely rare talent doesn't help.

Add in the fact that there is proof that Jedi extra-sensory perception is totally flawed, discounting the beliefs of a Jedi seems reasonable. People can't tell when a Jedi is actually having a real Force premonition or just talking out of his ass, and their inability to predict their own demise is pretty damning.

Jedi teachings are also suspect since everyone knows that there were other Force-capable organizations with different philosophies like the Sith.

There is also the fact that this is a sci-fi universe. The possibility is open that "Jedi talents" are some ancient alien tech that is not available to the public. Different aliens seem to have their own unique tech that is not available in the Republic/Empire (like cloning). Hell, with artificial gravity and antigrav and FTL being common pieces of tech, the possibility of a machine that can choke someone from the other side of the universe is actually more plausible than some biological talent.

At worst, the old holovids of Jedi could just be invented holograms and stage magician tricks. The number of people who have seen a Jedi actually do something badass seems to be limited to half a dozen Empire generals, a handful of Rebels, and a bunch of people who died in the Old Republic.

Believing that there is a wildly small number of people who might be able to throw a rock across the room with their minds is rational if pretty implausible. Believing that this person has anything to add to any conversation on any topic is not.
Last edited by K on Sat Apr 28, 2012 6:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
hogarth
Prince
Posts: 4582
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 1:00 pm
Location: Toronto

Post by hogarth »

Because Jedi/Sith in Star Wars are a zillion times rarer in Star Wars than clerics are in D&D.
OgreBattle wrote:George Lucas didn't think that far ahead.
And this.
Emerald
Knight-Baron
Posts: 565
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 9:18 pm

Post by Emerald »

K wrote:Anyone capable of using the Force is an extremely tiny proportion of the population (a hundred in a nation of billions), meaning that most people could easily see all the beliefs of the Jedi as mere superstition around a super-rare talent. The fact that those teachings offer nothing to someone without the extremely rare talent doesn't help.
Yep. In fact, by the start of episode 3, there are roughly 3500 Jedi in the galaxy, total. They've fallen a long way from their massive numbers in the earlier days of the Old Republic, so the vast majority of people seeing the new Empire's propaganda would never have met a Jedi in person or know someone who had met a Jedi in person.
Jedi teachings are also suspect since everyone knows that there were other Force-capable organizations with different philosophies like the Sith.
Actually, it's the reverse of this: the Sith kept their existence hidden as much as possible and most of the other Force traditions out there were just too small and obscure to garner much notice, so during the Empire's reign there was no one a Force-believer could point to and say "See, they're doing fine, the Force exists, the Jedi just screwed up." Jedi teachings were suspect because, as far as anyone knew, the only Force users in existence were Jedi and they were all gone.
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 14757
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Kaelik »

Emerald wrote:the Sith kept their existence hidden as much as possible
Nope. The Great Sith War is known as that by historians, not just Jedi. The Sith used to be totally and completely open about it for the vast majority of their existence. They didn't tell people specifically where Korriban is, but they did openly flaunt their power as one of the reasons you should pick their side over the Jedi.

It's only post rule of 2 that secrecy became a thing.
DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.

That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
TheFlatline
Prince
Posts: 2606
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:43 pm

Post by TheFlatline »

Kaelik wrote:
Emerald wrote:the Sith kept their existence hidden as much as possible
Nope. The Great Sith War is known as that by historians, not just Jedi. The Sith used to be totally and completely open about it for the vast majority of their existence. They didn't tell people specifically where Korriban is, but they did openly flaunt their power as one of the reasons you should pick their side over the Jedi.

It's only post rule of 2 that secrecy became a thing.
And the Sith were more or less assumed to have been wiped out.

The first Great Sith War/Hyperspace War was like 4-5000 years before Episode 4. The average person probably knows dick-all about it.
Lago PARANOIA
Invincible Overlord
Posts: 10555
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am

Post by Lago PARANOIA »

How could there be a Great Sith War if there's only supposed to be two of the motherfuckers?
Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.

In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.
User avatar
virgil
King
Posts: 6339
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by virgil »

There used to be more, but after so many wars, the remaining two decided to instate the Rule of Two. From what I'm to understand, part of their philosophy with this is that there is an actual Conservation of Ninjitsu with the Dark Side of the Force. Such that there is a finite amount of evil mojo for the Sith, and the more Sith there are, the more spread out it becomes; making there only be two be such that those two are monstrously powerful.
Come see Sprockets & Serials
How do you confuse a barbarian?
Put a greatsword a maul and a greataxe in a room and ask them to take their pick
EXPLOSIVE RUNES!
Lago PARANOIA
Invincible Overlord
Posts: 10555
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am

Post by Lago PARANOIA »

virgil wrote:Such that there is a finite amount of evil mojo for the Sith, and the more Sith there are, the more spread out it becomes; making there only be two be such that those two are monstrously powerful.
But Maul and Dooku went down to like two guys and Palpatine was able to be taken down by Mace Windu. There are thousands of Jedi. Just how lopsided is this conflict?
Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.

In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.
User avatar
Chamomile
Prince
Posts: 4632
Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 10:45 am

Post by Chamomile »

I thought the idea was just that Sith infighting tended to do more damage to their own side than to other people's, and thus the best ratio of Sith to non-Force or untrained allies actually turned out to be 2: X, where X is any finite number at all. Presumably, just one Sith would've been even better (no infighting at all), but then the line would be broken on his death.

Worth noting, however, that this philosophy was completely wrong. Since the instating of the Rule of Two, the only Sith to ever threaten the Jedi Order as a whole was Sidious, who broke the rule right in half by training dozens of different people in some part of the Sith arts and allowing Darth Vader and others to do the same. By ignoring the Rule of Two but still limiting the number of full Sith Lords, he actually successfully defeated the Republic.
Last edited by Chamomile on Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
virgil
King
Posts: 6339
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by virgil »

Lago PARANOIA wrote:
virgil wrote:Such that there is a finite amount of evil mojo for the Sith, and the more Sith there are, the more spread out it becomes; making there only be two be such that those two are monstrously powerful.
But Maul and Dooku went down to like two guys and Palpatine was able to be taken down by Mace Windu. There are thousands of Jedi. Just how lopsided is this conflict?
I never said their philosophy was a successful one. As Chamomile points out, it works better when you ignore the Rule of Two. The Sith probably just didn't think about using half-Sith to limit the number of Lords and their inherent infighting until Sidious.
Come see Sprockets & Serials
How do you confuse a barbarian?
Put a greatsword a maul and a greataxe in a room and ask them to take their pick
EXPLOSIVE RUNES!
Lago PARANOIA
Invincible Overlord
Posts: 10555
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am

Post by Lago PARANOIA »

Then the Sith are retarded, because rulers in the real world have figured out how to be reasonably safe with one person holding absolute power alongside side their similarly empowered peers since the dawn of human civilization. Even if said rulers are total evil bastards and have total evil bastard underlings. I mean, military coups and aristocrat-to-royalty assassinations/rebellions still happen, but not frequently enough that monarch reigning for several decades is unusual.
Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.

In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.
TheFlatline
Prince
Posts: 2606
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:43 pm

Post by TheFlatline »

Lago PARANOIA wrote:
virgil wrote:Such that there is a finite amount of evil mojo for the Sith, and the more Sith there are, the more spread out it becomes; making there only be two be such that those two are monstrously powerful.
But Maul and Dooku went down to like two guys and Palpatine was able to be taken down by Mace Windu. There are thousands of Jedi. Just how lopsided is this conflict?
If you go by the novelization Palpatine allowed himself to look beat so that Anakin would freak out and kill Windu. At any given time he probably could have crushed Windu. As far as raw power of the force, Yoda and Palpatine both threw everything that they had at each other and Palpatine was just slightly stronger in the force.

As far as Sith philosophy, it's hyper-darwinian to a degree that would make even Ayn Rand hesitate. That, combined with the dark side supposedly being quicker and easier to master than the light side, and you could see how it might appeal. If you and I started training in the force at the same time, and I went dark side, for quite a while I'd probably be way more powerful than you. Eventually you'd be more powerful, but that wouldn't matter if I killed you before we reached that equilibrium point.

Also, remember that Sith is not equivalent to Dark Side. You can be a dark sider without being Sith. Sith philosophy probably pushes you towards the dark side however.
TheFlatline
Prince
Posts: 2606
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:43 pm

Post by TheFlatline »

Lago PARANOIA wrote:Then the Sith are retarded, because rulers in the real world have figured out how to be reasonably safe with one person holding absolute power alongside side their similarly empowered peers since the dawn of human civilization. Even if said rulers are total evil bastards and have total evil bastard underlings. I mean, military coups and aristocrat-to-royalty assassinations/rebellions still happen, but not frequently enough that monarch reigning for several decades is unusual.
Palpatine ruled for like 40 years and only really had trouble at the end.

From what I'm aware of, the reason for the rule of two was also to keep the Sith alive and to keep the Jedi from hunting them down. It's far, far harder to find two specific people in the galaxy that you might not even realize are there to begin with.

Also, the dark side is at times portrayed as being *almost* intelligent, or at least aware of what was going on. It goes out of it's way to try to seduce people in a Coyote/Devil sort of way instead of simply always being present as an option.
User avatar
Dean
Duke
Posts: 2059
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 3:14 am

Post by Dean »

Seriously, no productive conversation or exchange of ideas can be had about any topic that includes the new terrible movies as part of the canon. They are nonsensical, non-canonical, non movies. They are garbage and cannot be included in any conversation about Star Wars that you intend to go anywhere.

Those movies are the worst pieces of film in western history, and I'm including propaganda films for the Klan in that statement.
DSMatticus wrote:Fuck you, fuck you, fuck you, fuck you. I am filled with an unfathomable hatred.
Winnah
Duke
Posts: 1091
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 2:00 pm
Location: Oz

Post by Winnah »

The comedian Simon Pegg (Shaun of the Dead) made a career from the Star Wars prequels.

"The Phantom Menace" or "Jar-Jar" was either the punchline or the set-up for about half the jokes on his TV series, Spaced.
Seerow
Duke
Posts: 1103
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 2:46 pm

Post by Seerow »

virgil wrote:There used to be more, but after so many wars, the remaining two decided to instate the Rule of Two. From what I'm to understand, part of their philosophy with this is that there is an actual Conservation of Ninjitsu with the Dark Side of the Force. Such that there is a finite amount of evil mojo for the Sith, and the more Sith there are, the more spread out it becomes; making there only be two be such that those two are monstrously powerful.
It wasn't even just the remaining two. One guy (Darth Bane I believe) took it upon himself to essentially destroy the last 100 or so sith simultaneously (I believe he manipulated them into committing suicide or some shit), because he came to the conclusion that having so many sith was actually what weakened them to the point where they were about to be defeated.
User avatar
CatharzGodfoot
King
Posts: 5668
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: North Carolina

Post by CatharzGodfoot »

Do they even count as Sith once they stop believing that competition will make them stronger?
The law in its majestic equality forbids the rich as well as the poor from stealing bread, begging and sleeping under bridges.
-Anatole France

Mount Flamethrower on rear
Drive in reverse
Win Game.

-Josh Kablack

Aharon
Master
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:55 am

Post by Aharon »

Lago PARANOIA wrote:Then the Sith are retarded, because rulers in the real world have figured out how to be reasonably safe with one person holding absolute power alongside side their similarly empowered peers since the dawn of human civilization. Even if said rulers are total evil bastards and have total evil bastard underlings. I mean, military coups and aristocrat-to-royalty assassinations/rebellions still happen, but not frequently enough that monarch reigning for several decades is unusual.
In the real world, possessing power doesn't (always) make you a psychopathic, sociopathic individual incapable of any positive feelings, the way the dark side does. It's far removed from anything that happens in the real world.

Also note how the Sith amassed vast amounts of wealth and political power while the rule of two was intact. Onlywhen Palpatine broke it and came out openly did he pave the road for defeat.
Last edited by Aharon on Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 14757
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Kaelik »

CatharzGodfoot wrote:Do they even count as Sith once they stop believing that competition will make them stronger?
Well that's the point, they never gave up on that. Rule of two is two specifically because that way the apprentice will always be trying to kill the master, and the master will always be trying to stay more powerful than the apprentice.
DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.

That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
User avatar
Neurosis
Duke
Posts: 1057
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:28 pm
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?

Post by Neurosis »

OgreBattle wrote:George Lucas didn't think that far ahead. is a fucking idiot.
For a minute, I used to be "a guy" in the TTRPG "industry". Now I'm just a nobody. For the most part, it's a relief.
Trank Frollman wrote:One of the reasons we can say insightful things about stuff is that we don't have to pretend to be nice to people. By embracing active aggression, we eliminate much of the passive aggression that so paralyzes things on other gaming forums.
hogarth wrote:As the good book saith, let he who is without boners cast the first stone.
TiaC wrote:I'm not quite sure why this is an argument. (Except that Kaelik is in it, that's a good reason.)
Post Reply