Pathfinder Is Still Bad

General questions, debates, and rants about RPGs

Moderator: Moderators

AcidBlades
Journeyman
Posts: 142
Joined: Mon May 11, 2015 12:54 am

Post by AcidBlades »

I don't really get why people shit their pants over Summoners. All the advantages that I really see is how they get certain spells generally a level earlier than full casters in some cases. Like the haste being a 2nd level spell for the Summoner.

Summoner Unchained seriously pisses me off. In like a livid, animalistic way. Because they tried to appease the people who wanted to pretend that their characters are viable life choices.
Last edited by AcidBlades on Sun Nov 15, 2015 10:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Eikre
Knight-Baron
Posts: 571
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 5:41 am

Post by Eikre »

Kaelik wrote:1) Planeshift material component is changed from a tuning fork of a specific size for the plane to a tuning fork "attuned" to a specific plane, whatever the fuck that means. So now DMs can hose you with bullshit about how you don't have a tuning fork to a plane and no one can ever get one without the wish spell, because no one has ever been to this plane and back, and so the tuning forks don't exist because you have to go to the plane to attune it.
If there there is just downright no way to get to a place, isn't that functionally equivalent to the place just not existing? Surely, dictating whether a place exists or not is a really obvious prerogative that the DM should have, isn't it? I personally do not feel like entertaining a cosmology that includes the Quasi-Elemental Plane of Smoke. Or even the Demonweb Pits, necessarily. Maybe I'm running a Norse-styled setting and the only available options for planar travel all end in "gard" or "heim." No, of course there isn't a tuning fork for Carceri, fuck you!
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 14793
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Kaelik »

Eikre wrote:
Kaelik wrote:1) Planeshift material component is changed from a tuning fork of a specific size for the plane to a tuning fork "attuned" to a specific plane, whatever the fuck that means. So now DMs can hose you with bullshit about how you don't have a tuning fork to a plane and no one can ever get one without the wish spell, because no one has ever been to this plane and back, and so the tuning forks don't exist because you have to go to the plane to attune it.
If there there is just downright no way to get to a place, isn't that functionally equivalent to the place just not existing? Surely, dictating whether a place exists or not is a really obvious prerogative that the DM should have, isn't it? I personally do not feel like entertaining a cosmology that includes the Quasi-Elemental Plane of Smoke. Or even the Demonweb Pits, necessarily. Maybe I'm running a Norse-styled setting and the only available options for planar travel all end in "gard" or "heim." No, of course there isn't a tuning fork for Carceri, fuck you!
Aside from your intense desire to be a huge fuck off dick for some reason, I have no idea what you are talking about. If a plane doesn't exist, then it doesn't exist, and no size or shape tuning fork can get you there, on the other hand, no one else can go there either. That is what it fucking means to decide on a setting, but if your DM has planeshift SLA monsters run away to a plane, but then tells you how no spellcaster has ever been able to go there and attune a fork, so fuck you, that is fucking dumb. And the DM can just keep making up more and more bullshit reasons why attuning a fork is impossible without Wish or Gate, because there is no possible definition of attuning the fork. You could straight up have a DM declare that it takes 500 years of ritual, and that would be as legal as any other stupid thing.

As for Carceri, you get that people go there all the time right? It is leaving that is supposed to hard.
DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.

That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
Eikre
Knight-Baron
Posts: 571
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 5:41 am

Post by Eikre »

Alright, I understand. When you said, "nobody has ever been there and back to attune a fork," I framed a situation in which... Nobody has ever been there and back.
This signature is here just so you don't otherwise mistake the last sentence of my post for one.
MisterDee
Knight-Baron
Posts: 816
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 8:40 pm

Post by MisterDee »

AcidBlades wrote:I don't really get why people shit their pants over Summoners. All the advantages that I really see is how they get certain spells generally a level earlier than full casters in some cases. Like the haste being a 2nd level spell for the Summoner.
The problem with the Summoner spell list is that other classes can get spells earlier because of spell list plundering.

The problem with the Summoner itself is that having one will fuck over your game as every fight gets bogged down in hordes of shitty summons and all noncombat problems get solved by infinite monkeys with typewriters.
AcidBlades
Journeyman
Posts: 142
Joined: Mon May 11, 2015 12:54 am

Post by AcidBlades »

MisterDee wrote:
AcidBlades wrote:I don't really get why people shit their pants over Summoners. All the advantages that I really see is how they get certain spells generally a level earlier than full casters in some cases. Like the haste being a 2nd level spell for the Summoner.
The problem with the Summoner spell list is that other classes can get spells earlier because of spell list plundering.

The problem with the Summoner itself is that having one will fuck over your game as every fight gets bogged down in hordes of shitty summons and all noncombat problems get solved by infinite monkeys with typewriters.
I am fairly well aware of the issue of having a bunch of tokens out on the field. It is frankly a drag to hear another iteration of "I do a full attack", or "claw, claw, bite. The standard" without any sort of variation at all. I know we all have our retinues but jesus.

On the other hand, the fact that this doesn't give any shit to say the various Animal Shaman druids, Clerics and Wizards is rather confusing.
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 14793
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Kaelik »

Druids who buff up themselves and their companion, and then cast summoning spells before every fight, and then get 3-5 turns during each fight of charging around full attacking are widely hailed as super great in optimization forums. And then never played in actual games. Because it is a huge fucking hassle and not as good as people say it is.
DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.

That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
ishy
Duke
Posts: 2404
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 2:59 pm

Post by ishy »

Antariuk wrote:With enough splatbooks in the game you can add Cha to pretty much anything you want, sometimes even twice thanks to PF's terrible power descriptions.
Actually you can't since the PF faq that claims ability scores are sources now and same source stuff doesn't stack.
Kaelik wrote:A friend on minmax just pointed out to me two minor changes in pathfinder spells:

1) Planeshift material component is changed from a tuning fork of a specific size for the plane to a tuning fork "attuned" to a specific plane, whatever the fuck that means. So now DMs can hose you with bullshit about how you don't have a tuning fork to a plane and no one can ever get one without the wish spell, because no one has ever been to this plane and back, and so the tuning forks don't exist because you have to go to the plane to attune it.
Except that they don't have a gold component listed and thus are in every spell component pouch.
Gary Gygax wrote:The player’s path to role-playing mastery begins with a thorough understanding of the rules of the game
Bigode wrote:I wouldn't normally make that blanket of a suggestion, but you seem to deserve it: scroll through the entire forum, read anything that looks interesting in term of design experience, then come back.
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 14793
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Kaelik »

ishy wrote:Except that they don't have a gold component listed and thus are in every spell component pouch.
That's a fine thing to say, but if the DM was the kind of asshole who is going to tell you that you can't find one, then he is going to also say they aren't in spell component pouches.

Although, I guess Eschew Materials still gets you to all the planes. So whatever. But still, you have to admit, the literally just removed content from the game by switching "tuning fork that's size determines plane" to "tuning fork that wargarbargarlargal plane"
Last edited by Kaelik on Mon Nov 16, 2015 10:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.

That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
User avatar
Maxus
Overlord
Posts: 7645
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Maxus »

ishy wrote:
Kaelik wrote:A friend on minmax just pointed out to me two minor changes in pathfinder spells:

1) Planeshift material component is changed from a tuning fork of a specific size for the plane to a tuning fork "attuned" to a specific plane, whatever the fuck that means. So now DMs can hose you with bullshit about how you don't have a tuning fork to a plane and no one can ever get one without the wish spell, because no one has ever been to this plane and back, and so the tuning forks don't exist because you have to go to the plane to attune it.
Except that they don't have a gold component listed and thus are in every spell component pouch.
That is retarded.

I love it.
He jumps like a damned dragoon, and charges into battle fighting rather insane monsters with little more than his bare hands and rather nasty spell effects conjured up solely through knowledge and the local plantlife. He unerringly knows where his goal lies, he breathes underwater and is untroubled by space travel, seems to have no limits to his actual endurance and favors killing his enemies by driving both boots square into their skull. His agility is unmatched, and his strength legendary, able to fling about a turtle shell big enough to contain a man with enough force to barrel down a near endless path of unfortunates.

--The horror of Mario

Zak S, Zak Smith, Dndwithpornstars, Zak Sabbath. He is a terrible person and a hack at writing and art. His cultural contributions are less than Justin Bieber's, and he's a shitmuffin. Go go gadget Googlebomb!
User avatar
Count Arioch the 28th
King
Posts: 6172
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Count Arioch the 28th »

There's a summoner in the group that has a spell that requires a drop of the caster's blood. I told him that by RAW he had an infinite supply of his own blood in his component pouch.
In this moment, I am Ur-phoric. Not because of any phony god’s blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my int score.
Aharon
Master
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:55 am

Post by Aharon »

The tuning fork isn't a material component, but a focus, so it isn't accessible via Eschew Materials, and hasn't been in 3.5 or 3.0, either. The bullshit DM shutdown of the spell isn't new.
Last edited by Aharon on Wed Nov 18, 2015 11:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
RobbyPants
King
Posts: 5201
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 6:11 pm

Post by RobbyPants »

Aharon wrote:The tuning fork isn't a material component, but a focus, so it isn't accessible via Eschew Materials, and hasn't been in 3.5 or 3.0, either. The bullshit DM shutdown of the spell isn't new.
But having a tune of the appropriate size doesn't require you to have been at the plane in the first place. The Pathfinder focus requires you to go to the plane (presumably?) and then do some unstated ritual to "attune" it.

Now, it's possible the DM could rule you can attune the fork in your own living room, but that's not stated, so the DM can be as permissive or restrictive as he wants.
Aharon
Master
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:55 am

Post by Aharon »

That's no change to the previous situation, IMO. The spell in the 3.5 PHB reads
Focus: A small, forked metal rod. The size
and metal type dictates to which plane of
existence or alternate dimension the spell
sends the affected creatures. Forked rods
keyed to certain planes or dimensions may
be difficult to come by, as decided by the
DM.
which basically encourages a certain kind of DM to make access very difficult
(type of metal could be "Metal found on that plane", for example).
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 14793
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Kaelik »

So here is the thing, the 3.5 version said that it was the size of the tuning fork, and that some were hard to find at DM's Discretion. That isn't that terrible, because it gives you some actual content.

I also don't care, because a level 9 Druid can planeshift the party without focuses anyway.

In Pathfinder, they deleted the part about DM Discretion, and also the part that explained how a tuning fork took you to a different plane. So now, the default rule is that a spell component pouch has all focuses except "focuses that wouldn't fit in a pouch." So while the RAW is probably that you can go to any plane, in practice, if your DM wants to stop you he's going to start calculating the volume of the pouch and then say you can only have X focuses. And that is fucking stupid. And then, once he says that, you have no fucking idea how to actually get a Tuning Fork, because you have no idea what the everloving fuck attuning is.

Also they removed Janni from the Summon Nature's Ally list and then nerfed their planeshift on top of it, so now only level 9 Wizard's can planeshift the party without focuses.
Last edited by Kaelik on Wed Nov 18, 2015 2:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.

That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
User avatar
Ice9
Duke
Posts: 1568
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Ice9 »

Kaelik wrote:Also they removed Janni from the Summon Nature's Ally list and then nerfed their planeshift on top of it, so now only level 9 Wizard's can planeshift the party without focuses.
Worse than that ...
PF Summon Monster wrote:A summoned monster cannot summon or otherwise conjure another creature, nor can it use any teleportation or planar travel abilities.
So no Plane Shift via summoning at all, you need (Lesser) Planar Binding.

Ironically, while they were reinforcing the requirement for Plane Shift, they pretty much removed it for Simulacrum. Instead of hair/blood, it now just requires an ice statue of the target. So as long as you've seen a picture of someone, you can make copies of them.
Last edited by Ice9 on Wed Nov 18, 2015 6:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
rampaging-poet
Knight
Posts: 473
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 5:18 am

Post by rampaging-poet »

Speaking of spell nerfs, I see that Paizo did their best to kick directly generating wealth from spells out of core. However, a simulacrum of a genie is still high enough level to create more simulacra with its wish SLA. Does Pathfinder have any good wealth or construction spells left to dupicate with wish, or should I just settle for taking over someone else's castle with my exponentially growing horde of efreet? I'll have over 4000 within a week.

Each one can create 75 five-foot square of 1" wall per day via wall of stone. I haven't checked the numbers on move earth but they can probably make large earthen ramparts that way much easier. I could always have one polymorph any object a rock into a castle, but I'd rather not have my entire fortress die to anyone that can make a DC 16 caster level check.
DSMatticus wrote:I sort my leisure activities into a neat and manageable categorized hierarchy, then ignore it and dick around on the internet.
My deviantArt account, in case anyone cares.
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 14793
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Kaelik »

Ice9 wrote:So no Plane Shift via summoning at all, you need (Lesser) Planar Binding.
Yes, that is why I said only a Wizard, because only Wizards have access to Lesser Planar Binding. Unlike Clerics and Druids.
DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.

That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
Krusk
Knight-Baron
Posts: 601
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 3:56 pm

Post by Krusk »

Ironically, we had this exact scenario come up two sessions ago (late october?). Wonder if my shitty dm is lurking. We had a player attempt to planeshift to hell in a 3.5 game, and the DM asked them if they had a tuning fork. They broke out a character sheet all proud and pointed at the line item "tuning fork for planeshift" on their sheet.

The DM smiled and asked where it was attuned. When they said "what do you mean", he ass pulled a ritual that required decades to do, and then said "but since I'm nice, you can say you attuned yours to a single plane ahead of time".
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 14793
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Kaelik »

Krusk wrote:he ass pulled a ritual that required decades to do
SEE WHAT I FUCKING MEAN!

I underestimated the amount of bullshit that Dumb Assholes will do to spite players.
DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.

That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
User avatar
RobbyPants
King
Posts: 5201
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 6:11 pm

Post by RobbyPants »

Krusk wrote: The DM smiled and asked where it was attuned. When they said "what do you mean", he ass pulled a ritual that required decades to do, and then said "but since I'm nice, you can say you attuned yours to a single plane ahead of time".
Do these things have a price listed? If there's no appreciable cost, the player similarly fuck with the DM by writing down 20 different tuning forks on their sheet at char-gen.

"My uncle, the archmage gave these to me."
ishy
Duke
Posts: 2404
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 2:59 pm

Post by ishy »

Yeah, lets write down every single spell component and focus in the book because the DM might say screw the rules, I'm the DM. (but then (s)he might just say plane shift doesn't work for unspecified reasons)
Gary Gygax wrote:The player’s path to role-playing mastery begins with a thorough understanding of the rules of the game
Bigode wrote:I wouldn't normally make that blanket of a suggestion, but you seem to deserve it: scroll through the entire forum, read anything that looks interesting in term of design experience, then come back.
User avatar
Previn
Knight-Baron
Posts: 766
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 2:40 pm

Post by Previn »

RobbyPants wrote:
Aharon wrote:The tuning fork isn't a material component, but a focus, so it isn't accessible via Eschew Materials, and hasn't been in 3.5 or 3.0, either. The bullshit DM shutdown of the spell isn't new.
But having a tune of the appropriate size doesn't require you to have been at the plane in the first place. The Pathfinder focus requires you to go to the plane (presumably?) and then do some unstated ritual to "attune" it.
Well, no it doesn't require you do it. It requires that someone did it and you got the tuned fork sometime down the line. Really, all you need is Planeshift as a SLA (or a creature with it) to either take you there, or bring back attuned forks since spell-like abilities negates the need for components and focuses.
Last edited by Previn on Thu Nov 19, 2015 3:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Dr_Noface
Knight-Baron
Posts: 777
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 12:01 am

Post by Dr_Noface »

Does anyone have the Bestiary 5?
User avatar
angelfromanotherpin
Overlord
Posts: 9745
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by angelfromanotherpin »

I have a copy in the store. Why?
Post Reply