We beat a Carcass Crab

Stories about games that you run and/or have played in.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
SunTzuWarmaster
Knight-Baron
Posts: 948
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

We beat a Carcass Crab

Post by SunTzuWarmaster »

Details: 3 level 4 characters burn nearly 100% of resources. Kill Carcass Crab in Eberron.

Grisly details:

Round 1:
Carcass crab spots cleric (myself) encroaching upon domain (a pile of bodies, stocked with magic, including at least 1 sentient item). Light of X spell cast in preparation (lasts 40 minutes). Begins dragging bodies away for proper burial/looting/last rites.
Crab charges cleric in the surprise round (40 ft), misses, and gets blasted with a readied/prepared Light of Venya (or whatever the level 2 spell is) for 9.

Round 2:
Rogue (halfling hurler/TWFer (darts/daggers)): moves into dart range, climbs out of earthcart, hides.

Beguiler (social elf, party face): fails to blind crab with a Blinding Color Surge (Beguiler is now invisible)

Cleric of the Silver Flame (human, archer...ish): 5' step back, Defensive Casting of Summon Monster I (Celestial Badger, I choose you!) with modified rules of that the monster appears but does not act until next round.

Crab: Hits and kills badger, advances 5', misses cleric.

Round 3:
Beguiler: Casts Glitterdust (crab makes save), moves to within Close range of the crab, hiding behind carcasses to the left.

Rogue (delayed until after beguiler): throws 2 darts, 1 hit (w/SA) for 7.

Cleric: sucking at concentration checks, not having bow out, melee and tactical retreat 5'.

Crab: hit/miss cleric for total of 9 (of 21).

Round 4:
Beguiler: Casts Glitterdust (crab makes save)

Rogue: throws 2 darts for 4.

Cleric: melee, retreat 5'.

Crab: miss/miss

Round 5:
Beguiler: Casts Glitterdust (crab makes save)

Rogue: hit/miss for 3.

Cleric: melee, retreat 5' (crab is now in the open and set up for a rogue flank)

crab: Kills cleric (hit/hit for 17).

Round 6:
Beguiler: Uses last level 2 spell for the day (has now used 5), Glitterdust, crab fails save, Woo!

Rogue: hit/hit (no dex AND -2 to AC is awesome) for something like 13.

Cleric: stabilizes (luck!)

Crab: takes a move action towards the rogue, finds rogue by virtue of moving into the rogue square and taking a sneak attack (7?), attacks rogue and hits for 7 (total hp is 18).

Round 7:
Beguiler: Whelm crab (fails save) for 2 (2d6, boo!).

Rogue: hit for something like 6, move action (silently) behind earthcart

Cleric: still dead

Crab: moves erratically back to home

Round 8:
Beguiler: heals cleric (potion on cleric)

Cleric: Spiritual Weapon (Bow of the Silver Flame) for 9.

Rogue: hit/hit for 12?

Crab: moves towards cleric/rogue, suffers AoO from cleric (2), misses cleric.

Round NINE (0 rounds left for Glitterdust)
Beguiler: move/Whelm (crab makes save)

Cleric: Spiritual Weapon (5), Rapid Shot for 14.

Rogue: hit/hit for 20. Kills crab.


------------------

I don't know if the numbers add up right, but we busted out something like 60 damage between 2 level 4 characters in 4 rounds. Something like 40 from the rogue alone. Yes, we found the weak spot for Massive Damage.

Side notes:
1 - Glitterdust is awesome
2 - if your Beguiler uses Whelm, he is Doing It Wrong.
3 - if your archer is your party tank, you also have problems.
4 - Small sized rogues don't matter without sneak attack.

Also, I don't know the Carcass Crab stats offhand, but I don't think it ever did less than 8 damage to a party where average hp is somewhere around 16.
cthulhu
Duke
Posts: 2162
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by cthulhu »

Glitterdust is probably the greatest level two spell.
Mask_De_H
Duke
Posts: 1995
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:17 pm

Post by Mask_De_H »

CRAB BATTLE~!

With this and other harrowing crab tales, I think they've earned the low level [Awesome] subtype. En Garde bitches.
FrankTrollman wrote: Halfling women, as I'm sure you are aware, combine all the "fun" parts of pedophilia without any of the disturbing, illegal, or immoral parts.
K wrote:That being said, the usefulness of airships for society is still transporting cargo because it's an option that doesn't require a powerful wizard to show up for work on time instead of blowing the day in his harem of extraplanar sex demons/angels.
Chamomile wrote: See, it's because K's belief in leaving generation of individual monsters to GMs makes him Chaotic, whereas Frank's belief in the easier usability of monsters pre-generated by game designers makes him Lawful, and clearly these philosophies are so irreconcilable as to be best represented as fundamentally opposed metaphysical forces.
Whipstitch wrote:You're on a mad quest, dude. I'd sooner bet on Zeus getting bored and letting Sisyphus put down the fucking rock.
Roy
Prince
Posts: 2772
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:53 pm

Post by Roy »

Is this it?

http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/eb/20040511a

I thought the Giant Enemy Crab was level 3. This fucker is 8.
Draco_Argentum wrote:
Mister_Sinister wrote:Clearly, your cock is part of the big barrel the server's busy sucking on.
Can someone tell it to stop using its teeth please?
Juton wrote:Damn, I thought [Pathfailure] accidentally created a feat worth taking, my mistake.
Koumei wrote:Shad, please just punch yourself in the face until you are too dizzy to type. I would greatly appreciate that.
Kaelik wrote:No, bad liar. Stop lying.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type I - doing exactly the opposite of what they said they would do.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type II - change for the sake of change.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type III - the illusion of change.
User avatar
CatharzGodfoot
King
Posts: 5668
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: North Carolina

Post by CatharzGodfoot »

Roy wrote:Is this it?

http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/eb/20040511a

I thought the Giant Enemy Crab was level 3. This fucker is 8.
Monstrous crab

CR 3, faster than you, stronger than you, more attacks than you, more damage than you, and improved grab.
The law in its majestic equality forbids the rich as well as the poor from stealing bread, begging and sleeping under bridges.
-Anatole France

Mount Flamethrower on rear
Drive in reverse
Win Game.

-Josh Kablack

Akula
Knight-Baron
Posts: 960
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 7:06 am
Location: Oakland CA

Post by Akula »

Don't forget constrict. It has a terrible will save though. Glitterdust wrecks its shit.
Roy
Prince
Posts: 2772
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:53 pm

Post by Roy »

Then they said the wrong name. And had terrible luck with Glitterdust.
Last edited by Roy on Sun Jul 26, 2009 11:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
Draco_Argentum wrote:
Mister_Sinister wrote:Clearly, your cock is part of the big barrel the server's busy sucking on.
Can someone tell it to stop using its teeth please?
Juton wrote:Damn, I thought [Pathfailure] accidentally created a feat worth taking, my mistake.
Koumei wrote:Shad, please just punch yourself in the face until you are too dizzy to type. I would greatly appreciate that.
Kaelik wrote:No, bad liar. Stop lying.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type I - doing exactly the opposite of what they said they would do.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type II - change for the sake of change.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type III - the illusion of change.
SunTzuWarmaster
Knight-Baron
Posts: 948
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by SunTzuWarmaster »

Looking up the monster, we apparently fought the CR 8 can-auto-kill-you-in-one-hit-and-gets-2-attacks crab. The DM must have rolled a few 2s (or fudged) on the to-hit rolls in order for me to stand there a few rounds and not get offed.

The DM specifically said that it shot a spine (round 1, it didn't charge, it did me some Dex damage and moved, sorry, bad memory), had Spiny Defense, and Adhesive.

Also, holy shit(!), our 3 lvl4 characters took out a CR 8. We should have a decently hard time enough with a CR 4 (in theory).

Seriously, facing this monster at level 8 adds laser beams, flight, and Salt Mephits into the mix from myself alone.
Roy
Prince
Posts: 2772
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:53 pm

Post by Roy »

It is possible, just the success rate is really low and it's meant to be a boss type deal.

Also, that crab has a lot more HP. You had really bad luck on the Glitterdust, got them all though.
Draco_Argentum wrote:
Mister_Sinister wrote:Clearly, your cock is part of the big barrel the server's busy sucking on.
Can someone tell it to stop using its teeth please?
Juton wrote:Damn, I thought [Pathfailure] accidentally created a feat worth taking, my mistake.
Koumei wrote:Shad, please just punch yourself in the face until you are too dizzy to type. I would greatly appreciate that.
Kaelik wrote:No, bad liar. Stop lying.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type I - doing exactly the opposite of what they said they would do.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type II - change for the sake of change.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type III - the illusion of change.
User avatar
erik
King
Posts: 5861
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by erik »

I wonder if it was a slightly nerfed Carcass Crab. It can't do less than 10 damage on a hit and I note the cleric taking 9 damage. Also don't see how the cleric got away since it has Improved Grab on dem claws.

If you busted out 94 damage to kill it (I think I added that up right) and it has 126 hp... that doesn't seem right either.

As far as CR 8's go, the Carcass Crab is pretty weak sauce. I'd rather face it than aaaaaany other CR 8 critter in the monster manual. That said, even still realistically that CR 8 specimen should kill your party a lot all day every day.

If that was a full on Carcass Crab then here's how things should have gone:

Cleric ought have been outright dead by round 3 (grappled from round 2, claw+bite grapple checks seal the deal). After it hit the rogue, improved grab once again should have been the end of his life. Then the beguiler is forced to run away.
Roy
Prince
Posts: 2772
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:53 pm

Post by Roy »

clikml wrote:I wonder if it was a slightly nerfed Carcass Crab. It can't do less than 10 damage on a hit and I note the cleric taking 9 damage. Also don't see how the cleric got away since it has Improved Grab on dem claws.

If you busted out 94 damage to kill it (I think I added that up right) and it has 126 hp... that doesn't seem right either.

As far as CR 8's go, the Carcass Crab is pretty weak sauce. I'd rather face it than aaaaaany other CR 8 critter in the monster manual. That said, even still realistically that CR 8 specimen should kill your party a lot all day every day.

If that was a full on Carcass Crab then here's how things should have gone:

Cleric ought have been outright dead by round 3 (grappled from round 2, claw+bite grapple checks seal the deal). After it hit the rogue, improved grab once again should have been the end of his life. Then the beguiler is forced to run away.
Probably was. Most of the people that only know how to make encounters hard via jacking the level up then turn around and frequently nerf the enemy when it proves overkill... this naturally trivializes anything you've accomplished and just makes you feel like a mook. It's different if they do know other ways and are just choosing to do a high level encounter though this is reserved for competent parties as retreat is near impossible in D&D, therefore if the PCs bite off more than they can chew the only non cheating way for them to get out of it on a reliable basis is to fight their way out as running won't accomplish anything except making them die tired.
Draco_Argentum wrote:
Mister_Sinister wrote:Clearly, your cock is part of the big barrel the server's busy sucking on.
Can someone tell it to stop using its teeth please?
Juton wrote:Damn, I thought [Pathfailure] accidentally created a feat worth taking, my mistake.
Koumei wrote:Shad, please just punch yourself in the face until you are too dizzy to type. I would greatly appreciate that.
Kaelik wrote:No, bad liar. Stop lying.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type I - doing exactly the opposite of what they said they would do.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type II - change for the sake of change.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type III - the illusion of change.
SunTzuWarmaster
Knight-Baron
Posts: 948
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by SunTzuWarmaster »

Yea, after looking at the stats we were probably fighting a slightly nerfed version. The DM made a comment of "what?! it doesn't have Improved Grab as a clawed creature?!".

94 hp seems about what we did (total may have been 105 or 89, but not 130).

9 damage to the cleric is estimated (I can't recall correctly... not that it matters, any 2 hits kill).

This was out of an Eberron module, so it may have been nerfed in the module without the DMs knowledge, or he may have nerfed it and pretend that he didn't. Toss up.
Post Reply