Page 1 of 2

Frantic Needs to be Banned

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 6:03 pm
by Username17
Seriously. Posting porn with chopped up girls in it is beyond the acceptable standards of even this forum. Also, he doesn't contribute to anything except flame wars with Roy.

Get that asshole off this forum. Right now.

-Username17

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 6:15 pm
by virgil
I'm agree. I did my usual 'open multiple tabs for new posts' routine, and then I got inundated with half a dozen of the same horrific...thing.

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 6:16 pm
by TavishArtair
I think the report on his post states that too, but in the event that he attempts to edit his post, I've taken a lovely screenshot with the imagelink still there. Actually, I've taken about 4. I can't upload them anywhere though, for kinda obvious reasons, so I can only send them to an e-mail address or something.

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 6:31 pm
by Lago PARANOIA
Thanks for pulling this stunt on me while I was on a computer with other people around, Frantic.

I really appreciate that. Enjoy your inevitable ban.

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:24 pm
by koz
Yeah, definitely ban-worthy. And very sad.

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:28 pm
by Akula
I'm with everyone else on this. There is no universe in which this could be considered acceptable behavior.

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:37 pm
by IGTN
I can't even remember anything else Frantic posted before that image other than in the most broad terms. He won't be missed.

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:42 pm
by violence in the media
Ummm, yeah. WTF was that about?

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:05 pm
by Cynic
Woah.... go away for several days and the world changes.

Even though I'm in an empty room. I'm too tired to think right now. So, I'll let the who uses extreme examples living in a county of porn guide my way in this blind challenge. i'll.... say no to chopped up girl porn.


Was there even a NSFW/SFW link or description next to it?

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:07 pm
by koz
A_Cynic wrote: Was there even a NSFW/SFW link or description next to it?
No. There was literally no point to that image (or rather those images) except to troll.

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:28 pm
by Bill Bisco: Isometric Imp
Hate to try to be a voice of reason here, but are we sure that Frantic purposefully put those images up there? I mean, if someone here were around longer, would you instantly ban them for that?

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:46 pm
by TavishArtair
Bill Bisco: Isometric Imp wrote:Hate to try to be a voice of reason here, but are we sure that Frantic purposefully put those images up there? I mean, if someone here were around longer, would you instantly ban them for that?
To the first question: Yes. You do not accidentally post the same image a half-dozen times.

To the second question: Yes. This site has posting privileges locked behind a password for a reason. If you have control of your identity here usurped you (or at least, your screen name) is still responsible for what happened. At the very least, we cannot allow the identity Frantic to continue here.

I, at least, frankly wouldn't give a damn if the person posting those images had the screen name of FrankTrollman. He should be banned, and if he wants to beg for mercy he can damn well get on his knees, but he can ask for forgiveness of the administrators from over there -> in the land of not-capable-of-posting.

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:18 pm
by Crissa
The solution to deliberate damage is to ban instantly, and sort it out later.

-Crissa

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 12:11 am
by PhoneLobster
If action is taken I suggest you check IP logs and such if possible.

Frantic's behavior could be consistent with a puppet account or something similar.

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 1:05 am
by Kaelik
Frantic is like the anti-Roy, but with everything to a more extreme. I am totally okay with banning him over that image spam being inappropriate. But I will say that it has given me new appreciation for Roy. At least he confines himself to lolcats.

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 1:31 am
by shau
Definitely needs to be banned.

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 1:40 am
by Psychic Robot
Yes on banning.
PL wrote:If action is taken I suggest you check IP logs and such if possible.

Frantic's behavior could be consistent with a puppet account or something similar.
Yes on this.

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:30 am
by Yugo
He should be banned for spamming. I don't need to see that stuff when I'm trying to read discussions.

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:33 am
by Username17
Kaelik wrote:Frantic is like the anti-Roy, but with everything to a more extreme. I am totally okay with banning him over that image spam being inappropriate. But I will say that it has given me new appreciation for Roy. At least he confines himself to lolcats.
Yes.

-Username17

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:39 am
by Grek
Frantic convinced me to forgive Eleaneser and take him off ignore. He was only mildly offensive compared to dismemberment porn.

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:44 am
by Absentminded_Wizard
Possibly dismemberment kiddie porn, too.

Yeah, I think whether it's Frantic's fault or not, the account needs to be banned to prevent further spamming.

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 4:27 am
by Cynic
So far, I'm just manually adblocked the image source er directory rather than thesite. dramatica has some fun stuff. I used to remember seeing a spider monkey script that worked in conjunction with adblock that did this automatically for forum software. I'll have to look it up. If I find it, I'll link it. I'll abstain from voting though.

Re: Frantic Needs to be Banned

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:07 am
by Draco_Argentum
FrankTrollman wrote:Seriously. Posting porn with chopped up girls in it is beyond the acceptable standards of even this forum.
Any forum where that is acceptable is seriously fucked up. Time for a banhammering.

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:16 am
by Fuchs
Indeed.

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:29 am
by Caedrus
I'll add my vote to the list. Ban Frantic.