Frantic Needs to be Banned

Practice posts and questions about the boards. The registration code for this board is 'Th3G@m|ngD3n' (Note the use of numbers and symbols!)

Moderator: Moderators

Username17
Serious Badass
Posts: 29894
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Frantic Needs to be Banned

Post by Username17 »

Seriously. Posting porn with chopped up girls in it is beyond the acceptable standards of even this forum. Also, he doesn't contribute to anything except flame wars with Roy.

Get that asshole off this forum. Right now.

-Username17
User avatar
virgil
King
Posts: 6339
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by virgil »

I'm agree. I did my usual 'open multiple tabs for new posts' routine, and then I got inundated with half a dozen of the same horrific...thing.
Come see Sprockets & Serials
How do you confuse a barbarian?
Put a greatsword a maul and a greataxe in a room and ask them to take their pick
EXPLOSIVE RUNES!
TavishArtair
Knight-Baron
Posts: 593
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by TavishArtair »

I think the report on his post states that too, but in the event that he attempts to edit his post, I've taken a lovely screenshot with the imagelink still there. Actually, I've taken about 4. I can't upload them anywhere though, for kinda obvious reasons, so I can only send them to an e-mail address or something.
Last edited by TavishArtair on Sun Jun 28, 2009 6:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Lago PARANOIA
Invincible Overlord
Posts: 10555
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am

Post by Lago PARANOIA »

Thanks for pulling this stunt on me while I was on a computer with other people around, Frantic.

I really appreciate that. Enjoy your inevitable ban.
Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.

In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.
koz
Duke
Posts: 1585
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:39 pm
Location: Oz

Post by koz »

Yeah, definitely ban-worthy. And very sad.
Everything I learned about DnD, I learned from Frank Trollman.
Kaelik wrote:You are so full of Strawmen that I can only assume you actually shit actual straw.
souran wrote:...uber, nerd-rage-inducing, minutia-devoted, pointless blithering shit.
Schwarzkopf wrote:The Den, your one-stop shop for in-depth analysis of Dungeons & Dragons and distressingly credible threats of oral rape.
DSM wrote:Apparently, The GM's Going To Punch You in Your Goddamned Face edition of D&D is getting more traction than I expected. Well, it beats playing 4th. Probably 5th, too.
Frank Trollman wrote:Giving someone a mouth full of cock is a standard action.
PoliteNewb wrote:If size means anything, it's what position you have to get in to give a BJ.
Image
Akula
Knight-Baron
Posts: 960
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 7:06 am
Location: Oakland CA

Post by Akula »

I'm with everyone else on this. There is no universe in which this could be considered acceptable behavior.
IGTN
Knight-Baron
Posts: 729
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:13 am

Post by IGTN »

I can't even remember anything else Frantic posted before that image other than in the most broad terms. He won't be missed.
"No, you can't burn the inn down. It's made of solid fire."
violence in the media
Duke
Posts: 1724
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 7:18 pm

Post by violence in the media »

Ummm, yeah. WTF was that about?
User avatar
Cynic
Prince
Posts: 2776
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Cynic »

Woah.... go away for several days and the world changes.

Even though I'm in an empty room. I'm too tired to think right now. So, I'll let the who uses extreme examples living in a county of porn guide my way in this blind challenge. i'll.... say no to chopped up girl porn.


Was there even a NSFW/SFW link or description next to it?
Ancient History wrote:We were working on Street Magic, and Frank asked me if a houngan had run over my dog.
koz
Duke
Posts: 1585
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:39 pm
Location: Oz

Post by koz »

A_Cynic wrote: Was there even a NSFW/SFW link or description next to it?
No. There was literally no point to that image (or rather those images) except to troll.
Everything I learned about DnD, I learned from Frank Trollman.
Kaelik wrote:You are so full of Strawmen that I can only assume you actually shit actual straw.
souran wrote:...uber, nerd-rage-inducing, minutia-devoted, pointless blithering shit.
Schwarzkopf wrote:The Den, your one-stop shop for in-depth analysis of Dungeons & Dragons and distressingly credible threats of oral rape.
DSM wrote:Apparently, The GM's Going To Punch You in Your Goddamned Face edition of D&D is getting more traction than I expected. Well, it beats playing 4th. Probably 5th, too.
Frank Trollman wrote:Giving someone a mouth full of cock is a standard action.
PoliteNewb wrote:If size means anything, it's what position you have to get in to give a BJ.
Image
User avatar
Bill Bisco: Isometric Imp
Knight
Posts: 447
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:12 am

Post by Bill Bisco: Isometric Imp »

Hate to try to be a voice of reason here, but are we sure that Frantic purposefully put those images up there? I mean, if someone here were around longer, would you instantly ban them for that?
Black Marches
"Real Sharpness Comes Without Effort"
TavishArtair
Knight-Baron
Posts: 593
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by TavishArtair »

Bill Bisco: Isometric Imp wrote:Hate to try to be a voice of reason here, but are we sure that Frantic purposefully put those images up there? I mean, if someone here were around longer, would you instantly ban them for that?
To the first question: Yes. You do not accidentally post the same image a half-dozen times.

To the second question: Yes. This site has posting privileges locked behind a password for a reason. If you have control of your identity here usurped you (or at least, your screen name) is still responsible for what happened. At the very least, we cannot allow the identity Frantic to continue here.

I, at least, frankly wouldn't give a damn if the person posting those images had the screen name of FrankTrollman. He should be banned, and if he wants to beg for mercy he can damn well get on his knees, but he can ask for forgiveness of the administrators from over there -> in the land of not-capable-of-posting.
Last edited by TavishArtair on Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Crissa
King
Posts: 6720
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Santa Cruz

Post by Crissa »

The solution to deliberate damage is to ban instantly, and sort it out later.

-Crissa
PhoneLobster
King
Posts: 6403
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by PhoneLobster »

If action is taken I suggest you check IP logs and such if possible.

Frantic's behavior could be consistent with a puppet account or something similar.
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 14758
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Kaelik »

Frantic is like the anti-Roy, but with everything to a more extreme. I am totally okay with banning him over that image spam being inappropriate. But I will say that it has given me new appreciation for Roy. At least he confines himself to lolcats.
shau
Knight-Baron
Posts: 599
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by shau »

Definitely needs to be banned.
User avatar
Psychic Robot
Prince
Posts: 4607
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 10:47 pm

Post by Psychic Robot »

Yes on banning.
PL wrote:If action is taken I suggest you check IP logs and such if possible.

Frantic's behavior could be consistent with a puppet account or something similar.
Yes on this.
Count Arioch wrote:I'm not sure how discussions on whether PR is a terrible person or not is on-topic.
Ant wrote:
Chamomile wrote:Ant, what do we do about Psychic Robot?
You do not seem to do anything.
Yugo
1st Level
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 4:41 am

Post by Yugo »

He should be banned for spamming. I don't need to see that stuff when I'm trying to read discussions.
Username17
Serious Badass
Posts: 29894
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Username17 »

Kaelik wrote:Frantic is like the anti-Roy, but with everything to a more extreme. I am totally okay with banning him over that image spam being inappropriate. But I will say that it has given me new appreciation for Roy. At least he confines himself to lolcats.
Yes.

-Username17
Grek
Prince
Posts: 3114
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:37 pm

Post by Grek »

Frantic convinced me to forgive Eleaneser and take him off ignore. He was only mildly offensive compared to dismemberment porn.
Chamomile wrote:Grek is a national treasure.
User avatar
Absentminded_Wizard
Duke
Posts: 1122
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Ohio
Contact:

Post by Absentminded_Wizard »

Possibly dismemberment kiddie porn, too.

Yeah, I think whether it's Frantic's fault or not, the account needs to be banned to prevent further spamming.
Doom314's satirical 4e power wrote:Complete AnnihilationWar-metawarrior 1

An awesome bolt of multicolored light fires from your eyes and strikes your foe, disintegrating him into a fine dust in a nonmagical way.

At-will: Martial, Weapon
Standard Action Melee Weapon ("sword", range 10/20)
Target: One Creature
Attack: Con vs AC
Hit: [W] + Con, and the target is slowed.
User avatar
Cynic
Prince
Posts: 2776
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Cynic »

So far, I'm just manually adblocked the image source er directory rather than thesite. dramatica has some fun stuff. I used to remember seeing a spider monkey script that worked in conjunction with adblock that did this automatically for forum software. I'll have to look it up. If I find it, I'll link it. I'll abstain from voting though.
Ancient History wrote:We were working on Street Magic, and Frank asked me if a houngan had run over my dog.
Draco_Argentum
Duke
Posts: 2434
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Frantic Needs to be Banned

Post by Draco_Argentum »

FrankTrollman wrote:Seriously. Posting porn with chopped up girls in it is beyond the acceptable standards of even this forum.
Any forum where that is acceptable is seriously fucked up. Time for a banhammering.
Fuchs
Duke
Posts: 2446
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:29 am
Location: Zürich

Post by Fuchs »

Indeed.
Caedrus
Knight-Baron
Posts: 728
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Caedrus »

I'll add my vote to the list. Ban Frantic.
Locked