Maj wrote:Actually, I started going to church again (Yes, I'm Mormon, mock me later, please)
Actually, I'm going to mock you mercilessly
right now because it makes a very important point.
See, Islam doesn't have a central authority. It's core beliefs aren't what's written in a book, they aren't what some guy says, they are whatever the people who identify themselves as Muslims happen to believe. And there are a billion muslims. There about 40 million wahhabists and Taliban and all that combined. That means that the people who even belong to the branch of Islam who support suicide bombs and shit are about 4% of the total. That's literally
one fifth the percentage of Americans who believe that the sun moves around the Earth. So saying that Islam supports violent uprising against modernity is substantially less truthful than saying that America rejects the Heliocentric solar system. Indeed, the Wahhabists that we are fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan while arming in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan (seriously, I don't understand it either) are heretics against the Muslim faith. They are heretics because 96% of Muslims think that they are full of shit.
But Mormonism isn't democratic. There's a high council. There's a pope (although he is called the "Chief Seer and Revelator" - apparently without irony). It is a top-down, structured affair and the views of the organization are the views of the people at the top. While in Islam anyone who happens to be Muslim can "speak for Muslims" in Mormonism there's seriously just one guy and what he says goes. If your opinions contradict his, you are a heretic, and it doesn't matter how many people happen to agree with you.
Now as it happens, it is the stated goal of the LDS church to
destroy the planet. They have a number of plans, which range from DR. Strangelove to Captain Planet. In any case, if you oppose their actual world destroying agenda, you're a heretic. This isn't hyperbole or religious mumbo jumbo either. They are seriously and actually the largest financial backer of pro-nuclear, pro-war, and anti-environmentalist lobbying in the United States. A good part of every dollar that is tithed to the Mormon Elders in Utah is converted to straight up bribes to congressmen and industry leaders to advance the destruction of the world in any possible way that they can.
Since I seem to gather from Maj's conversational style that she personally is not intent upon wiping out all life on Earth in a holocaust of nuclear or solar devastation, Maj is a heretic. She probably tithes the customary 10% of family wages (such as they are) to the Temple, so really her objections mean fuck-all, but she personally holds views which would brand her as a heretic if the Church of Latter Day Saints actually kicked anyone out so long as they continued to pay dues (Ask Keith how
being convicted of incestuous child molestation can get you
nearly excommunicated from Mormonism).
As it is, she simply goes on day to day, week to week, and holds opinions which are not in line with those of the organization she supports. And that means that in the big picture she actually is
supporting those views. If some Hui woman happens to wear a headscarf or some Indonesian man bows to Mecca, Osma Bin Laden gets no more power because Osama Bin Laden is a heretic as far as they are concerned and structurally they are correct. When Maj passes on the teachings of Joseph Smith or gives money or time to church projects, she actually does make Gordon Bitner Hinckley stronger.
The same Gordon B. Hinckley who was given a Presidential Medal of Freedom by George W. Bush in 2004 for his strident pro-war efforts. The same Gordon B. Hinckley who plays host to anti-environmental
strategy sessions with Dick Cheney. And
that is what Maj supports every day whether she likes it or not because Mormonism is a top down institution and Gordon B. Hinckley is on the top and she is down.
Now, we can perhaps only speculate as to
why Gordon Hinckley wants to destroy the planet or why Maj might help him do that, but I think it has something to do with this:
Gordon Hinckley, 1994 wrote:On the other hand, the whole design of the gospel is to lead us onward and upward to greater achievement, even, eventually, to godhood.
-Username17