Draco_Argentum wrote:
Objectionable porn is about half of it
Objectionable porn? I have to say, I've found things I find pretty objectionable - and I don't mean "I object to furries/men". But I'm guessing that's "illegal content sites that we managed to find and pin down".
Still, I'm curious.
Also, I love how Frank can make anything sound like a crisis of the planet.
I confess, I'm mostly ambivalent toward the presence or absence of such a filter, so long as the filtered dictionary isn't too large (defined in an entirely arbitrary way, by me). Some people may sometimes find it easier to rely on a slew of unimaginative curses rather than address whatever topic is at hand, and if you all consider this to be the case, you'd certainly be within your rights to institute a filter for facilitating discussion - it's far from a sacrilege against the First Amendment to do so. But, I hold no preference.
I am rather against a filter. If people want to swear, I say let them. If this impedes communication or offends people, that's their problem, and I don't see why the more mature people on this board should be punished for it.
Everything I learned about DnD, I learned from Frank Trollman.
Kaelik wrote:You are so full of Strawmen that I can only assume you actually shit actual straw.
Schwarzkopf wrote:The Den, your one-stop shop for in-depth analysis of Dungeons & Dragons and distressingly credible threats of oral rape.
DSM wrote:Apparently, The GM's Going To Punch You in Your Goddamned Face edition of D&D is getting more traction than I expected. Well, it beats playing 4th. Probably 5th, too.
Frank Trollman wrote:Giving someone a mouth full of cock is a standard action.
PoliteNewb wrote:If size means anything, it's what position you have to get in to give a BJ.
I'd like to point out that I rarely swear as much as I did in my rant. I was emulating a certain style, and part of that style is to swear even more casually than I actually do.
Cuz apparently I gotta break this down for you dense motherfuckers- I'm trans feminine nonbinary. My pronouns are they/them.
Winnah wrote:No, No. 'Prak' is actually a Thri Kreen impersonating a human and roleplaying himself as a D&D character. All hail our hidden insect overlords.
FrankTrollman wrote:In Soviet Russia, cosmic horror is the default state.
You should gain sanity for finding out that the problems of a region are because there are fucking monsters there.
Draco_Argentum wrote:
Objectionable porn is about half of it
Objectionable porn? I have to say, I've found things I find pretty objectionable - and I don't mean "I object to furries/men". But I'm guessing that's "illegal content sites that we managed to find and pin down".
Still, I'm curious.
Also, I love how Frank can make anything sound like a crisis of the planet.
See the news thread, wikileaks has a copy now. Conroy's denial rings false.
As much as I miss "fvck," I don't think we should actually reinstate word filters. Now, if we could all agree that we should filter "fuck" to "fvck" for like, nostalgia's sake, I'd be all for that. Simply because I loved that word.
CHICKENS ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO DO COCAINE, SILKY HEN
Josh_Kablack wrote:You are not a unique and precious snowflake, you are just one more fucking asshole on the internet who presumes themselves to be better than the unwashed masses.
Schwarzkopf wrote:The Den, your one-stop shop for in-depth analysis of Dungeons & Dragons and distressingly credible threats of oral rape.
DSM wrote:Apparently, The GM's Going To Punch You in Your Goddamned Face edition of D&D is getting more traction than I expected. Well, it beats playing 4th. Probably 5th, too.
Frank Trollman wrote:Giving someone a mouth full of cock is a standard action.
PoliteNewb wrote:If size means anything, it's what position you have to get in to give a BJ.
Cielingcat wrote:As much as I miss "fvck," I don't think we should actually reinstate word filters. Now, if we could all agree that we should filter "fuck" to "fvck" for like, nostalgia's sake, I'd be all for that. Simply because I loved that word.
The Creator has spoken.
Hans Freyer, s.b.u.h. wrote:A manly, a bold tone prevails in history. He who has the grip has the booty.
Huston Smith wrote:Life gives us no view of the whole. We see only snatches here and there, (...)
brotherfrancis75 wrote:Perhaps you imagine that Ayn Rand is our friend? And the Mont Pelerin Society? No, those are but the more subtle versions of the Bolshevik Communist Revolution you imagine you reject. (...) FOX NEWS IS ALSO COMMUNIST!
LDSChristian wrote:True. I do wonder which is worse: killing so many people like Hitler did or denying Christ 3 times like Peter did.
Falgund wrote:Words are meaningless, only the intent counts.
I don't care about curse words used as punctuation. I do care that wordfilters break the meaning of perfectly non profanity phrases. I do care that wordfilters do nothing to mask the intent of profanity phrases.
I think what you're talking about is when a filtered word appears in the middle of another word, and the filters fuck up the longer word. If so... phpBB doesn't have that problem. I just tested this over on Nifty, where we filter "shit" to "spoon." This is what posted:
spoon
thisisabigpieceofshitandyouknowit
this_is_a_big_piece_of_shit_and_you_know_it
When I posted, that's what showed up in each instance. In both the second and third cases, "shit" still appears just fine.
I don't have an opinion one way or the other on the filter; but I figured I'd chime in with that piece of information about how the filters work in the forum software.
You can't fix stupid.
"A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives." ~ Jackie Robinson
That's convenient. Being able to type s before hit without it converting it to **** (something that I experienced on a site with worse codeing) keeps the filter from filtering stuff we don't want (mostly, at least) - assuming we want one at all, but that's another discussion from how well it works.
Thanks for passing this on.
Trust in the Emperor, but always check your ammunition.
I have changed my mind with regard to the profanity filter: I don't think there should be one here. Not because I think it'd be evil censorship or any such nonsense, but simply because there's already a bunch of other message boards one can go to if one wants discussion with these filters. There is, I think, value in having The Gaming Den be different for seriously nothing but difference's sake. Maybe the quality of discourse will be worse, maybe better, but that it is different gives us a reason to be here rather than someplace else.
I remember one time right after the digital protection act was passed (before t was negated by the courts) that word filters were common and given much control.
Being kicked and banned for talking about breast cancer awareness; the Dick van Dyke show; umm... Well, there were many of them which would be insta-bans in various places.
Ick. Having "Fuck" turn into "fvck" or "hug", fine. Having it turn into "You have been banished from the Den." (even only for say, five minutes) is ridiculous.
Trust in the Emperor, but always check your ammunition.
Second Life is being sued now because adults can sometimes see nipples on statues in PG (default) areas in a virtual world where you have to sign an agreement that you're an adult to enter.
I don't understand the fear of nipples. I mean, genitals, fine, I suppose they vaguely have something there - given the choice I'd rather not see male danglies. But nipples? Everyone has those!
And if people can sue over seeing things that offend them, then can I mention that fat tummies hanging out offends me? Or horrible unkempt neckbeards?
Koumei wrote:I don't understand the fear of nipples. I mean, genitals, fine, I suppose they vaguely have something there - given the choice I'd rather not see male danglies. But nipples? Everyone has those!
I refuse to lower actual breasts to a comparison with my nipples.
Koumei wrote:And if people can sue over seeing things that offend them, then can I mention that fat tummies hanging out offends me? Or horrible unkempt neckbeards?
Oh, the problem's that, you see, the authorities have plenty of those, so it's not shameful. Also, the Sky Fairy even used to urge keeping them.
Hans Freyer, s.b.u.h. wrote:A manly, a bold tone prevails in history. He who has the grip has the booty.
Huston Smith wrote:Life gives us no view of the whole. We see only snatches here and there, (...)
brotherfrancis75 wrote:Perhaps you imagine that Ayn Rand is our friend? And the Mont Pelerin Society? No, those are but the more subtle versions of the Bolshevik Communist Revolution you imagine you reject. (...) FOX NEWS IS ALSO COMMUNIST!
LDSChristian wrote:True. I do wonder which is worse: killing so many people like Hitler did or denying Christ 3 times like Peter did.
I can't help but feel that I am in some way responsible for this thread.
You all know that if 'fuck' and 'shit' get banned, I'm just going to go for more and more disgusting imagery. Think about it.
Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.
In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.