From the Depths of Wikipedia

Mundane & Pointless Stuff I Must Share: The Off Topic Forum

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Ancient History
Serious Badass
Posts: 12708
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:57 pm

Post by Ancient History »

User avatar
Darth Rabbitt
Overlord
Posts: 8869
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 8:31 pm
Location: In "In The Trenches," mostly.
Contact:

Post by Darth Rabbitt »

Pseudo Stupidity wrote:This Applebees fucking sucks, much like all Applebees. I wanted to go to Femboy Hooters (communism).
User avatar
Ancient History
Serious Badass
Posts: 12708
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:57 pm

Post by Ancient History »

User avatar
Ancient History
Serious Badass
Posts: 12708
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:57 pm

Post by Ancient History »

User avatar
nockermensch
Duke
Posts: 1898
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 1:11 pm
Location: Rio: the Janeiro

Post by nockermensch »

@ @ Nockermensch
Koumei wrote:After all, in Firefox you keep tabs in your browser, but in SovietPutin's Russia, browser keeps tabs on you.
Mord wrote:Chromatic Wolves are massively under-CRed. Its "Dood to stone" spell-like is a TPK waiting to happen if you run into it before anyone in the party has Dance of Sack or Shield of Farts.
User avatar
Ancient History
Serious Badass
Posts: 12708
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:57 pm

Post by Ancient History »

User avatar
Ancient History
Serious Badass
Posts: 12708
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:57 pm

Post by Ancient History »

User avatar
Ancient History
Serious Badass
Posts: 12708
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:57 pm

Post by Ancient History »

User avatar
Ancient History
Serious Badass
Posts: 12708
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:57 pm

Post by Ancient History »

User avatar
erik
King
Posts: 5861
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by erik »

User avatar
Ancient History
Serious Badass
Posts: 12708
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:57 pm

Post by Ancient History »

User avatar
Ancient History
Serious Badass
Posts: 12708
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:57 pm

Post by Ancient History »

User avatar
Ancient History
Serious Badass
Posts: 12708
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:57 pm

Post by Ancient History »

User avatar
tussock
Prince
Posts: 2937
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 4:28 am
Location: Online
Contact:

Post by tussock »

Heh, Hobbit should've been allowed for D&D after all.
PC, SJW, anti-fascist, not being a dick, or working on it, he/him.
User avatar
Judging__Eagle
Prince
Posts: 4671
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Lake Ontario is in my backyard; Canada

Post by Judging__Eagle »

tussock wrote:Heh, Hobbit should've been allowed for D&D after all.
Yes, and no. While you can have the name of Hobbits, your intellectual property's contents versions of said Hobbits will have to cleave to the definitions from the Denham Tracts, not Tolkien's work. Alternately, you can use a word Tolkien also used (Halflings) instead, that seem much more "generic", and harder to enforce intellectual property over.

An other reason is that the Tolkien estate had to protect their intellectual property rights with The Hobbit. Specific intellectual property had to be protected by their rights holders. If there are examples of the holders not enforcing their rights; then their rights are more easily allowed to lapse into the public. Disney's constant pushback on the deadlines for the expiration of their IP rights for all these decades beyond Walt Disney's death; and have basically made everything after Disney's death never able to enter the public domain.

Also, this interesting explanation makes a lot of sense:

from:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hobbit_(w ... arlier_use [Apology for no hotlink. For some reason, using the [ url ] tag made this post blank, even trimming the post-# characters doesn't work]
wiki wrote: In the December 2003 Oxford English Dictionary newsletter, the following appears:[6]

"4. hobbit — J. R. R. Tolkien modestly claimed not to have coined this word, although the Supplement to the OED credited him with the invention of it in the absence of further evidence. It seems, however, that Tolkien was right to be cautious. It has since turned up in one of those 19th-century folklore journals, in a list of long-forgotten words for fairy-folk or little people. It seems likely that Tolkien, with his interest in folklore, read this and subconsciously registered the name, reviving it many years later in his most famous character. [Editor's note: although revision of the OED's entry for hobbit will of course take this evidence for earlier use into account, it does not yet appear in the online version of the entry.]"
Last edited by Judging__Eagle on Tue Sep 26, 2017 11:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.
The Gaming Den; where Mathematics are rigorously applied to Mythology.

While everyone's Philosophy is not in accord, that doesn't mean we're not on board.
User avatar
erik
King
Posts: 5861
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by erik »

Judging__Eagle wrote:An other reason is that the Tolkien estate had to protect their intellectual property rights with The Hobbit. Specific intellectual property had to be protected by their rights holders. If there are examples of the holders not enforcing their rights; then their rights are more easily allowed to lapse into the public.
"Had to" is probably not the best phrasing. They chose to. As I understand things, if they wanted to allow it to be used without losing their rights they could have licensed it for $1.

That said, I don't think there was any great loss from people having to say Halfling instead of Hobbit. All the greatest hits from Middle Earth were already public domain.
Post Reply