Lamentations of the Flame Princess...what it is?

General questions, debates, and rants about RPGs

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Neurosis
Duke
Posts: 1057
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:28 pm
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?

Lamentations of the Flame Princess...what it is?

Post by Neurosis »

What is the consensus of the Den (the...conDensus?) on this game? It's an OSR retroclone/fantasy heartbreaker, it's got some seriously crazy art, Zak S (who as I recall some of you guys don't like) wrote a sourcebook for it. I just got like all the PDFs for it from a bundle of holding offer.

I'm only a few pages in to flipping through it, but I'm already intrigued/cautiously optimistic.

So if you're familiar with it tell me why it sucks or doesn't and why.

:viking:
For a minute, I used to be "a guy" in the TTRPG "industry". Now I'm just a nobody. For the most part, it's a relief.
Trank Frollman wrote:One of the reasons we can say insightful things about stuff is that we don't have to pretend to be nice to people. By embracing active aggression, we eliminate much of the passive aggression that so paralyzes things on other gaming forums.
hogarth wrote:As the good book saith, let he who is without boners cast the first stone.
TiaC wrote:I'm not quite sure why this is an argument. (Except that Kaelik is in it, that's a good reason.)
User avatar
erik
King
Posts: 5861
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by erik »

Not quite a full review but I have a play report that goes over several key and colorful aspects of the system.
User avatar
angelfromanotherpin
Overlord
Posts: 9745
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by angelfromanotherpin »

It's a stupid retroclone with no particular redeeming value, that faps to randumbness more than most. Also, a lot of the adventures are gross-out fodder in an attempt to capitalize on the 'adult' tone they want the game to have. That said, I do like some of the adventures; the high-weird-historical setting they default to is pretty neat, and Thulian Echoes has a great concept for a module.
User avatar
erik
King
Posts: 5861
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by erik »

I find only one fault in that summary. The encumbrance rules are actually the best I've seen in any game. Other than that, no redeeming value.
Blicero
Duke
Posts: 1131
Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 12:07 am

Post by Blicero »

erik wrote:I find only one fault in that summary. The encumbrance rules are actually the best I've seen in any game. Other than that, no redeeming value.
The ACKS encumbrance rules are pretty similar (both are in terms of stones rather than pounds), but I think that they might be better.

@ schwarzkopf

If you have a bunch of friends who want to play a D&Dlike, and most of you are lazy and/or drunk, there may not be a better system for you than LotFP. (That is meant to be genuine praise.) If you do not meet that qualification, then LotFP's greatest virtue is probably that it is quite minimalist and can be hacked with ease. It is not a system meant for long-term play. But that can obviously be changed.

It is also an interesting example of how a small number of changes to the D&D paradigm can alter its implicit feel in surprisingly major ways. Compared to LotFP, I think that ACKS is a Basic D&D hack that better channels what D&D tends to try to be.

If you have a group of players who are willing to accept "rocks fall, everyone dies" as a casual session outcome, then a lot of LotFP's adventures are pretty neat. Red and Pleasant Land is quite impressive. Raggi's dungeons seem a bit linear for my tastes, but his willingness to throw money at people and let them do their thing is admirable.
Last edited by Blicero on Tue Jul 26, 2016 3:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Out beyond the hull, mucoid strings of non-baryonic matter streamed past like Christ's blood in the firmament.
User avatar
TOZ
Duke
Posts: 1159
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 3:19 pm

Post by TOZ »

Terrible.
User avatar
erik
King
Posts: 5861
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by erik »

I'm not familiar with ACKS, but if they're using stones rather than just "items" and "heavy items" then it sounds inferior. I like not giving a damn about pounds or stones.

I guess I will qualify "best" since I think Nexus has a better encumbrance system, but that's because it is just a fleshed out/tweaked version of the LotFP mechanic.

Now to update my lotfp report thread since this post has reminded me in a nostalgic mood.
User avatar
Zak S
Knight
Posts: 441
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 3:06 am

Post by Zak S »

I did 3 books for it: Vornheim (which got high praise here at the Den)
Red & Pleasant Land (4 Ennies)
and the revised Death Frost Doom.

LotFP itself is mostly like every other B/X clone except twisted a little toward a horror atmosphere and power levels (PCs are more fragile than Basic, magic is harsher and weirder) but is 80% the same.

Conservative gamers complain about the gore in the art but it's pretty much heavy metal standard so if you don't cry or throw up when you watch a Dario Argento movie or look at the posters in a record store you're probably fine.

The real point is the adventures and supplements--the game was originally just a pretext to publish weird high-production-values modules. The adventures have a lot of variety-- Kenneth Hite did Qelong, which is a cool southeast-asian sandbox, Dave Brockie from Gwar did a full-on grossout adventure called 2 towers, storygamer king Vincent Baker did one, the adventures written by James himself tend to combine a lot of historical research with tough-but-not-impossible fucked-up horror scenarios.

There is a lot of randomness which is, of course, excellent.
Last edited by Zak S on Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
Y'know that stereotype about virgin D&D nerds in their mom's basement? If you read something about me or the girls here, it's probably one of them trolling for our attention. For the straight story, come to: http://dndwithpornstars.blogspot.com and ask.
User avatar
virgil
King
Posts: 6339
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by virgil »

erik wrote:I'm not familiar with ACKS, but if they're using stones rather than just "items" and "heavy items" then it sounds inferior. I like not giving a damn about pounds or stones.
I've heard of stones encumbrance systems that are only tangentially related to weight, and more like a use of nomenclature where 1 stone = 1 item/bundle.
Come see Sprockets & Serials
How do you confuse a barbarian?
Put a greatsword a maul and a greataxe in a room and ask them to take their pick
EXPLOSIVE RUNES!
Mask_De_H
Duke
Posts: 1995
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:17 pm

Post by Mask_De_H »

Oh god he has risen.

I need a flask of holy water, a yogi and a shotgun.
FrankTrollman wrote: Halfling women, as I'm sure you are aware, combine all the "fun" parts of pedophilia without any of the disturbing, illegal, or immoral parts.
K wrote:That being said, the usefulness of airships for society is still transporting cargo because it's an option that doesn't require a powerful wizard to show up for work on time instead of blowing the day in his harem of extraplanar sex demons/angels.
Chamomile wrote: See, it's because K's belief in leaving generation of individual monsters to GMs makes him Chaotic, whereas Frank's belief in the easier usability of monsters pre-generated by game designers makes him Lawful, and clearly these philosophies are so irreconcilable as to be best represented as fundamentally opposed metaphysical forces.
Whipstitch wrote:You're on a mad quest, dude. I'd sooner bet on Zeus getting bored and letting Sisyphus put down the fucking rock.
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 14757
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Kaelik »

Mask_De_H wrote:Oh god he has risen.

I need a flask of holy water, a yogi and a shotgun.
I thought they had regeneration against everything except Acid and Fire.
DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.

That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
User avatar
GnomeWorks
Master
Posts: 281
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 12:19 am

Re: Lamentations of the Flame Princess...what it is?

Post by GnomeWorks »

Schwarzkopf wrote:Zak S
...and just like that, the narcissist appears.
User avatar
Count Arioch the 28th
King
Posts: 6172
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Count Arioch the 28th »

I actually appreciated Zak's post. David Brockie did a TTRPG adventure, I need to see this shit...
In this moment, I am Ur-phoric. Not because of any phony god’s blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my int score.
User avatar
Prak
Serious Badass
Posts: 17340
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Prak »

Yeah, that post was actually not a problem at all. Don't drag baggage from post to post, especially when the last flamewar was, what, a year ago? More?
Cuz apparently I gotta break this down for you dense motherfuckers- I'm trans feminine nonbinary. My pronouns are they/them.
Winnah wrote:No, No. 'Prak' is actually a Thri Kreen impersonating a human and roleplaying himself as a D&D character. All hail our hidden insect overlords.
FrankTrollman wrote:In Soviet Russia, cosmic horror is the default state.

You should gain sanity for finding out that the problems of a region are because there are fucking monsters there.
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 14757
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Kaelik »

Prak wrote:Yeah, that post was actually not a problem at all. Don't drag baggage from post to post, especially when the last flamewar was, what, a year ago? More?
His particular post was not so bad, aside from mildly misleading praise for his own shit, but that doesn't mean people can't comment on his very existence, if they want. It's not dragging baggage around to make jokes about the monster showing up in any way it isn't also baggage to imply/state that I am very angry. Characteristics of posting usually hold true, and making extremely mild jokes about it isn't something to whine about.
DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.

That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
User avatar
OgreBattle
King
Posts: 6820
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:33 am

Post by OgreBattle »

erik wrote:I'm not familiar with ACKS, but if they're using stones rather than just "items" and "heavy items" then it sounds inferior. I like not giving a damn about pounds or stones.
ACKS doesn't define item weight categories as cleanly as NEXUS but they do get into it with their inventory list.

1 stone= 6 lighter items

a lighter item is things like 1 crowbar, a week's worth of rations, a mallet and 4 iron spikes, etc.


----

Looking through Flame Princess and ACKS, ACKS strikes me as more to my taste, though FP seems good for a one-shot to see what horrible miscast kills you/the party, that orky kind of fun.
User avatar
Neurosis
Duke
Posts: 1057
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:28 pm
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?

Post by Neurosis »

Zak S wrote:I did 3 books for it: Vornheim (which got high praise here at the Den)
Red & Pleasant Land (4 Ennies)
and the revised Death Frost Doom.

LotFP itself is mostly like every other B/X clone except twisted a little toward a horror atmosphere and power levels (PCs are more fragile than Basic, magic is harsher and weirder) but is 80% the same.

Conservative gamers complain about the gore in the art but it's pretty much heavy metal standard so if you don't cry or throw up when you watch a Dario Argento movie or look at the posters in a record store you're probably fine.

The real point is the adventures and supplements--the game was originally just a pretext to publish weird high-production-values modules. The adventures have a lot of variety-- Kenneth Hite did Qelong, which is a cool southeast-asian sandbox, Dave Brockie from Gwar did a full-on grossout adventure called 2 towers, storygamer king Vincent Baker did one, the adventures written by James himself tend to combine a lot of historical research with tough-but-not-impossible fucked-up horror scenarios.

There is a lot of randomness which is, of course, excellent.
Here are some thoughts on what I've read of LotFP so far. Can't speak to your modules yet Zak, I haven't read 'em yet but I probably will.

I also understand that D. Vincent Baker wrote a setting heavily inspired by Jack Vance? I am so torn about that, because Vincent Baker can eat every dick in existence for all I care, but I am in love with Jack Vance's Dying Earth series.

0) I do think that "roll 3d6 six times in order" is a pretty terrible way to roll up a character, but this is so easy to fix with a house-rule it's almost not worth mentioning. For instance: "You have a pool of 72 points to spend on your six attributes." There, I just did it. Or: "Roll 4d6, drop the lowest die, six times, and assign the results as you please". There, I just did it again differently. So kind of a non-issue.

1) While it doesn't quite completely fix the fighters/wizards problem we talk about constantly on the Den, I feel that giving ONLY fighters any kind of progression to their combat abilities at all actually DOES help bring them closer to overall parity with Magic-Users and Clerics (various Denners will disagree with me on this point using various levels of colorful language). (To anyone familiar with recent editions of D&D, Fighters in LotFP get a "Good" base attack progression, and everyone else never gets a to-hit bonus above +1.)

2) I like the way that the Specialist class handles skill points about ten times better than the way D&D 3.X/Pathfailure handled skills , and about 1000 times better than how OD&D and retroclones like Osric handle Thieves/Rogues.

3) I like how the Wisdom stat explicitly states that it does not actually enable the character to act wisely, that's the player's responsibility. I just think it shouldn't be called Wisdom and there's really no good reason it is besides "old skool".

4) I don't like that the Charisma stat explicitly states that it doesn't make your character's personality any more likeable. That seems like some bullshit for people that want to play charismatic characters but aren't charismatic in real life.

5) I like the way it handles alignments as primarily being a means of tracking how your character is effected by various elemental forces, rather than being tied up with actual ethics and morals.

I haven't really looked at the magic system yet, and since this IS a retroclone which is to say this is basically D&D, that means I really don't actually know much of anything about the game yet.
If you have a bunch of friends who want to play a D&Dlike, and most of you are lazy and/or drunk, there may not be a better system for you than LotFP.
That actually describes me pretty damn accurately, except for the "bunch" part. The friends are less in number than I'd like these days. But the laziness and drunkness is there for sure.
Conservative gamers complain about the gore in the art but it's pretty much heavy metal standard so if you don't cry or throw up when you watch a Dario Argento movie or look at the posters in a record store you're probably fine.
Man, this is so not a problem for me. I myself am not "metal", but every other tabletop campaign I've run is metal as fuck. I mean, I like RIFTS (dear God, not the system mind you, but every sourcebook looks like an Iron Maiden album cover and I mean fuck yes).
Last edited by Neurosis on Wed Jul 27, 2016 8:49 pm, edited 3 times in total.
For a minute, I used to be "a guy" in the TTRPG "industry". Now I'm just a nobody. For the most part, it's a relief.
Trank Frollman wrote:One of the reasons we can say insightful things about stuff is that we don't have to pretend to be nice to people. By embracing active aggression, we eliminate much of the passive aggression that so paralyzes things on other gaming forums.
hogarth wrote:As the good book saith, let he who is without boners cast the first stone.
TiaC wrote:I'm not quite sure why this is an argument. (Except that Kaelik is in it, that's a good reason.)
User avatar
Avoraciopoctules
Overlord
Posts: 8624
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 5:48 pm
Location: Oakland, CA

Post by Avoraciopoctules »

Zak S wrote:The real point is the adventures and supplements--the game was originally just a pretext to publish weird high-production-values modules. The adventures have a lot of variety-- Kenneth Hite did Qelong, which is a cool southeast-asian sandbox, Dave Brockie from Gwar did a full-on grossout adventure called 2 towers, storygamer king Vincent Baker did one, the adventures written by James himself tend to combine a lot of historical research with tough-but-not-impossible fucked-up horror scenarios.
I bought Qelong a few years back, thought it was my favorite LotFP module. Really interesting example of a super-hostile setting, though the rules were kind of meh. You could run a bunch of really weird/cool adventures with the hooks provided, though their default reason to wander into radioactive hell jungles feels a little weak.

EDIT: BTW, this might be the bundle that was mentioned earlier https://bundleofholding.com/presents/Lamentations
Last edited by Avoraciopoctules on Thu Jul 28, 2016 5:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Neurosis
Duke
Posts: 1057
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:28 pm
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?

Post by Neurosis »

Yeah, that's the bundle I got. : )

Pretty good deal, those bundle of holding things. I've actually had one of my games in one, so I know that Allen Varney makes out from the deal too.

Frank should talk to Allen Varney about doing an After Sundown/Tome "Best of the Den" Bundle of Holding. I'm at least half-serious.
Last edited by Neurosis on Fri Jul 29, 2016 3:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
For a minute, I used to be "a guy" in the TTRPG "industry". Now I'm just a nobody. For the most part, it's a relief.
Trank Frollman wrote:One of the reasons we can say insightful things about stuff is that we don't have to pretend to be nice to people. By embracing active aggression, we eliminate much of the passive aggression that so paralyzes things on other gaming forums.
hogarth wrote:As the good book saith, let he who is without boners cast the first stone.
TiaC wrote:I'm not quite sure why this is an argument. (Except that Kaelik is in it, that's a good reason.)
User avatar
malak
Master
Posts: 264
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 11:10 pm

Re: Lamentations of the Flame Princess...what it is?

Post by malak »

Schwarzkopf wrote: Lamentations of the Flame Princess...what it is?

It's a shitty OSR clone with some of the most amazing adventures available, and amazingly violent/funny art.

Image

The free RPG day adventure 'Better than any Man' is one of the best adventures I've ever ran, and I really like the LotFP suggested approach of placing campaigns in a magical, twisted version of the real world in history (usually Europe, but there's also an adventure set in Nigeria, ...).

A conflict between catholics and protestants in the thirty years war feel just way more interesting to me than a conflict between X-fantasy-god and Y-fantasy-god, and you can put real events such as the Magdeburger Bluthochzeit (Bloody Wedding) into the adventure.

There's also an adventure about the conflicts between Newton, Hooke and Halley during the writing of the Principia Mathematica, a 'slasher movie' adventure in the 1620ies England, or the trollish 'Fuck for Satan'.

A few adventures are also 'more traditional', such as a dimension-hopping monolith, a Haunted Chateau in France or the nice twist on tomb-of-horror named Thulian Echoes.

Just use the adventure ideas and settings with your favourite D&D-like rule set.

Image
Last edited by malak on Sat Jul 30, 2016 11:29 pm, edited 12 times in total.
CapnTthePirateG
Duke
Posts: 1545
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:07 am

Post by CapnTthePirateG »

Isn't this the thing that Feist ripped off of?
OgreBattle wrote:"And thus the denizens learned that hating Shadzar was the only thing they had in common, and with him gone they turned their venom upon each other"
-Sarpadian Empires, vol. I
Image
User avatar
erik
King
Posts: 5861
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by erik »

CapnTthePirateG wrote:Isn't this the thing that Feist ripped off of?
Could you qualify that some? The only Feist I know would be Raymond Feist which doesn't make any sense, and Feist the singer which makes even less sense.
User avatar
Longes
Prince
Posts: 2867
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:02 pm

Re: Lamentations of the Flame Princess...what it is?

Post by Longes »

malak wrote:The free RPG day adventure 'Better than any Man' is one of the best adventures I've ever ran, and I really like the LotFP suggested approach of placing campaigns in a magical, twisted version of the real world in history (usually Europe, but there's also an adventure set in Nigeria, ...).

A conflict between catholics and protestants in the thirty years war feel just way more interesting to me than a conflict between X-fantasy-god and Y-fantasy-god, and you can put real events such as the Magdeburger Bluthochzeit (Bloody Wedding) into the adventure.
We'll have to disagree here. I thought that "Better than any man" was one of the most annoying anti-player adventures I've ever seen. Especially the epic level evil necromancer who feels the need to subcontract to newbie adventurers, and the final dungeon that's just there to fuck you.
User avatar
codeGlaze
Duke
Posts: 1083
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 9:38 pm

Post by codeGlaze »

WTF is up with the call-back to the demon-birthing human from WW in the player book? D:
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 14757
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Lamentations of the Flame Princess...what it is?

Post by Kaelik »

Longes wrote:
malak wrote:The free RPG day adventure 'Better than any Man' is one of the best adventures I've ever ran, and I really like the LotFP suggested approach of placing campaigns in a magical, twisted version of the real world in history (usually Europe, but there's also an adventure set in Nigeria, ...).

A conflict between catholics and protestants in the thirty years war feel just way more interesting to me than a conflict between X-fantasy-god and Y-fantasy-god, and you can put real events such as the Magdeburger Bluthochzeit (Bloody Wedding) into the adventure.
We'll have to disagree here. I thought that "Better than any man" was one of the most annoying anti-player adventures I've ever seen. Especially the epic level evil necromancer who feels the need to subcontract to newbie adventurers, and the final dungeon that's just there to fuck you.
To be fair, if someone is the type of person to like anything at all about LotFP, then they are also exactly the kind of anti-player idiot who would also like anti-player adventures.
DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.

That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
Post Reply