The New Harry Potter Book

Mundane & Pointless Stuff I Must Share: The Off Topic Forum

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
JonSetanta
King
Posts: 5525
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: interbutts

Re: The New Harry Potter Book

Post by JonSetanta »

Still can't believe the Waese thinks Miss Watson isn't hot.

Scottish girls FTW. Although, her choice in alcohol has much to be improved.

Image

shirak: Totally agree.
The Adventurer's Almanac wrote:
Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:25 pm
Nobody gives a flying fuck about Tordek and Regdar.
Fuzzy_logic
Journeyman
Posts: 125
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: The New Harry Potter Book

Post by Fuzzy_logic »

I'd like to point out, for the record, that there are approximately a kajillion Bad Gryffindors.

See: Gilderoy Lockhart, Sirius Black, Fred & George Weasley, etc.

User avatar
JonSetanta
King
Posts: 5525
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: interbutts

Re: The New Harry Potter Book

Post by JonSetanta »

I'd probably be Slytherin, unless I'm more like Sirius then I realize and just kidding myself.
The Adventurer's Almanac wrote:
Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:25 pm
Nobody gives a flying fuck about Tordek and Regdar.
User avatar
Count Arioch the 28th
King
Posts: 6172
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: The New Harry Potter Book

Post by Count Arioch the 28th »

Fuzzy_logic at [unixtime wrote:1191295320[/unixtime]]I'd like to point out, for the record, that there are approximately a kajillion Bad Gryffindors.

See: Gilderoy Lockhart, Sirius Black, Fred & George Weasley, etc.



I always thought Fred and George weren't bad people, just chaotic (Giant frog!)
In this moment, I am Ur-phoric. Not because of any phony god’s blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my int score.
Fuzzy_logic
Journeyman
Posts: 125
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: The New Harry Potter Book

Post by Fuzzy_logic »

Fred and George are complicated. It all depends on how you value big picture vs. small picture choices, and philosophy vs. personality.

They get major, major brownie points for their frequent, heroic opposition to evil. They fought, repeatedly, agaisnt Voldemort, and that probably pushes them up to CN.

Without that opportunity for atonement through heroism, though they're pretty clearly the bad guys. They are generally perceived as chaotic, but that's wrong. They aren't just disorganized, spontaneous, mirthful, or happy-go-lucky. Even calling them disorganized, imprudent and unreliable is too kind.

What they are is bigoted, cruel, and dangerous.

Seriously, their hearts are NOT in the right place. Besides appearing to find violence funny, they are the source of Ron's misogyny.

And those endearing "pranks" all too often cause their victims permanenet damage.

Seriously, if Voldemort were a Gryffindor, they'd have been first to sign up.
User avatar
Count Arioch the 28th
King
Posts: 6172
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: The New Harry Potter Book

Post by Count Arioch the 28th »

You're going to have to explain yourself to me a bit better on a few points.

How are Fred and George bigoted, and how was Ron misogynist?

And when did their pranks cause permanent damage?
In this moment, I am Ur-phoric. Not because of any phony god’s blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my int score.
technomancer
Journeyman
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: The New Harry Potter Book

Post by technomancer »

Well, it would be permanat damage if magic wern't such a cure-all. And their sometimes cruel humor definatly played a role in Rons insecurities, which he did take out on Hermione and Ginny (and pretty much everyone else he hung out with), which is probably where fuzzy is getting misogynism.
Fuzzy_logic
Journeyman
Posts: 125
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: The New Harry Potter Book

Post by Fuzzy_logic »

Off the top of my head, they gave Ron a permanent fear of spiders (incidentally, not only do they not regret this, they deliberately taunt him about it later-- IIRC), and caused some kind of brain damage to Montague.

There's more, but I'm not remembering...

And Ron says something dumb about girls, like, every time he opens his mouth.
User avatar
Count Arioch the 28th
King
Posts: 6172
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: The New Harry Potter Book

Post by Count Arioch the 28th »

Fuzzy_logic at [unixtime wrote:1191373350[/unixtime]]Off the top of my head, they gave Ron a permanent fear of spiders (incidentally, not only do they not regret this, they deliberately taunt him about it later-- IIRC), and caused some kind of brain damage to Montague.

There's more, but I'm not remembering...

And Ron says something dumb about girls, like, every time he opens his mouth.


I don't remember who Montague is, I'm afraid.

And to be perfectly honest, if saying dumb things about girls is misogynist, then every boy between the ages of 2 and 15 are misogynist too.

Hell, I STILL say dumb things about girls on occasion, mostly because I don't know what the hell they want exactly.
In this moment, I am Ur-phoric. Not because of any phony god’s blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my int score.
shirak
Knight
Posts: 468
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Thessaloniki, Greece

Re: The New Harry Potter Book

Post by shirak »

Fuzzy_logic at [unixtime wrote:1191373350[/unixtime]]And Ron says something dumb about girls, like, every time he opens his mouth.


Except in the last book where the twins give him
a book called Twelve Sure-Fire Ways to Charm Girls.


And then he gives it to Harry for his birthday. It's even stupider than it sounds.
Fuzzy_logic
Journeyman
Posts: 125
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: The New Harry Potter Book

Post by Fuzzy_logic »

"Everybody does it" isn't much of a defense. especially when it isn't true. I never fell for the more obvious forms of sexism, so I manged to get to 15 without saying really anything dumb about girls as a group.

Plus, the wizarding world is much more egalitarian than ours. Women are pretty common in positions of authority, and they have the full range of magical powers, and more importantly NOBODY FINDS THIS ODD.

Seriously, even Draco, who in real life would be a big-time misogynist, never goes after Hermione for being a girl. Only a mudblood.

Similarly, Neville doesn't go around complaining about how confusing girls are.

Seriously, in the entire series there are six people who buy into this macho bullshit. Morfin and what's-his-face Gaunt are all about the oppressing women. But they're clearly anachronistic. Harry moans about not understanding women, but that's because he doesn't understand ANYBODY. He was raised in a freaking cupboard under the stairs.

And then there's the Weasleys.



User avatar
Count Arioch the 28th
King
Posts: 6172
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: The New Harry Potter Book

Post by Count Arioch the 28th »

Fuzzy_logic at [unixtime wrote:1191420442[/unixtime]]"Everybody does it" isn't much of a defense. especially when it isn't true.


Alright, let me say this again.

You are going to have to explain what Ron said that was so sexist, because I do not see it. You need to give specific examples of sexist things he said, or else I'm not inclined to beleive you.
In this moment, I am Ur-phoric. Not because of any phony god’s blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my int score.
User avatar
Bigode
Duke
Posts: 2246
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: The New Harry Potter Book

Post by Bigode »

Also, please explain why Draco would be sexist only if in real life.
Hans Freyer, s.b.u.h. wrote:A manly, a bold tone prevails in history. He who has the grip has the booty.
Huston Smith wrote:Life gives us no view of the whole. We see only snatches here and there, (...)
brotherfrancis75 wrote:Perhaps you imagine that Ayn Rand is our friend? And the Mont Pelerin Society? No, those are but the more subtle versions of the Bolshevik Communist Revolution you imagine you reject. (...) FOX NEWS IS ALSO COMMUNIST!
LDSChristian wrote:True. I do wonder which is worse: killing so many people like Hitler did or denying Christ 3 times like Peter did.
technomancer
Journeyman
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: The New Harry Potter Book

Post by technomancer »

Probably because he is extremely elitist, and hates everybody who isn't him. Not rich? Not pureblood? Not Slytherin? You're Crap. It's not that much of a stretch to add "Not male? You're crap."
Post Reply