Pathfinder Is Still Bad

General questions, debates, and rants about RPGs

Moderator: Moderators

radthemad4
Duke
Posts: 2073
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:20 pm

Post by radthemad4 »

Orion wrote:Yeah, although the relevance of the archetypes is limited if everyone is playing dungeonomicon monks and races of war fighters. Basically my question is whether I can run the Den version of 3.5 and tell everyone it's Pathfinder.
Definitely. Just use their skill system, their boosted races, allow their casting classes as options (and perhaps Alchemists, though they could use some boosting), their new spells, magic items, monsters, etc. You could probably apply some of the archetypes to Tome classes, perhaps converting their benefits into scaling feats if they don't want to give up existing features. Some PF feat chains could be converted into scaling feats as well, or into Tome monk fighting styles or something. If you're willing to do a bit of extra bookkeeping, you could also allow Favored Class Bonuses (you could come up with new appropriate ones for Tome classes if the existing unique ones don't work as for instance a Tome Monk doesn't use Ki) and Traits to make it feel more Pathfindery, though these probably aren't worth the extra effort involved for both players and MCs.
Eikre
Knight-Baron
Posts: 571
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 5:41 am

Post by Eikre »

It wouldn't be hard to write a whole PF patch to the Tome canon in like a day.

It would be a little harder to write a whole Tome patch to the PF canon. Is there a Tome Gunslinger? Because that guy has the same disparity in merit to player interest as a Monk does, and a proper Tome game would have an answer for that.
This signature is here just so you don't otherwise mistake the last sentence of my post for one.
User avatar
Pixels
Knight
Posts: 430
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 9:06 pm

Post by Pixels »

Eikre wrote:Is there a Tome Gunslinger?
Koumei's Gun Mage.
User avatar
OgreBattle
King
Posts: 6820
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:33 am

Post by OgreBattle »

Eikre wrote:It wouldn't be hard to write a whole PF patch to the Tome canon in like a day.

It would be a little harder to write a whole Tome patch to the PF canon. Is there a Tome Gunslinger? Because that guy has the same disparity in merit to player interest as a Monk does, and a proper Tome game would have an answer for that.
A Tome Fighter with a gun and ranged attack feats.
A Tome Samurai with a heirloom double hackbut so he can roll 8d12 for Kiai attacks.
A Tome Monk with a gun

PF gunslinger deeds generally do less interesting things than [combat] feats, monk stances, or rolling a fistful of dice.
Last edited by OgreBattle on Thu Dec 11, 2014 11:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ghremdal
Master
Posts: 203
Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 1:48 am

Post by Ghremdal »

I am in need of some inspiration. What are the really mean monsters from the bestiary assuming encounter level between 14 and 18.
User avatar
Avoraciopoctules
Overlord
Posts: 8624
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 5:48 pm
Location: Oakland, CA

Post by Avoraciopoctules »

Groups of movanic and monadic devas are immune to a lot of stuff, and are good fighters with some nasty tricks. If your party is full of casters, movanic antimagic is really annoying.

http://www.d20pfsrd.com/bestiary/monste ... emerdaemon
Can be an incredible nuisance without even getting into line of sight.

http://www.d20pfsrd.com/bestiary/monste ... l/planetar
Shuffle around prepared spells a bit and totally ruin someone's day.

http://www.d20pfsrd.com/bestiary/monste ... -brijidine
Some nasty battlefield control tricks.
Orca
Knight-Baron
Posts: 877
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 1:31 am

Post by Orca »

A few shining children (http://www.d20pfsrd.com/bestiary/monste ... ning-child) could set up a nasty ambush, between screen, wall of force, mirage arcana and symbol of insanity.
User avatar
Avoraciopoctules
Overlord
Posts: 8624
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 5:48 pm
Location: Oakland, CA

Post by Avoraciopoctules »

I'd like to run a few adventures for a mid-to-high level party. Starting at level 8 with 2 free levels for monster races and templates, and then jumping ahead a few levels at a time as the players absorb souls or bind themselves to artifacts. I've been asked to have dynamic battles with lots of special terrain, but I haven't got anything specific in mind yet. Any suggestions?
User avatar
Dean
Duke
Posts: 2059
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 3:14 am

Post by Dean »

We've covered this a couple times but in Pathfinder monstrous races don't need free levels, quite the opposite really because they already get lots of free levels.
DSMatticus wrote:Fuck you, fuck you, fuck you, fuck you. I am filled with an unfathomable hatred.
User avatar
Avoraciopoctules
Overlord
Posts: 8624
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 5:48 pm
Location: Oakland, CA

Post by Avoraciopoctules »

Yeah, it's one free monster level for every three actual levels. When the party jumps to level 12, some them will probably grab another template like lich or half-dragon for a total of 4 monster levels.
Koumei
Serious Badass
Posts: 13877
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: South Ausfailia

Post by Koumei »

We've talked about special terrain a bit before. Like here.

But I don't think it's ever progressed beyond "a few ideas and general discussion" into "here's a big pile of stuff you can pick up and use".
Count Arioch the 28th wrote:There is NOTHING better than lesbians. Lesbians make everything better.
MisterDee
Knight-Baron
Posts: 816
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 8:40 pm

Post by MisterDee »

So, is there a good published Pathfinder adventure for characters that have a double-digit number on the Level line? I don't need awesome production value, but well-written box text would be a huge plus.

Ideally, I'd want something I can run through in three long sessions or so.

(Also, it doesn't have to be an actual high-level adventure. The super-extended, mid-level-but-with-bigger-fireballs playstyle that I'd expect of, say, a Paizo adventure would be quite fine.)
User avatar
Archmage Joda
Knight
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 6:30 pm

Post by Archmage Joda »

What would the optimal way to go be for a "time/space" mage, one who bends time and space, and controls gravity and similar effects? Kind of like the Time Mage class from certain final fantasy games? A Cleric with the Void and Travel domains? A conjuration wizard? A Time oracle? Something I'm not thinking of?
Lago PARANOIA
Invincible Overlord
Posts: 10555
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am

Post by Lago PARANOIA »

If your DM has lost their mind and is letting you use a Candle of Invocation, about how many uses can you get out of it as a cleric?
Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.

In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.
Grek
Prince
Posts: 3114
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:37 pm

Post by Grek »

Worst case scenario: Your DM rules that you need to have the candle burning for the full 1 hour of your spell preparation. The candle only burns for 4 hours, so you can use it at most 4 times for spell preparation.

Best case scenario: You have access to tindertwigs to light the candle, an assistant (or strong winds, or your DM ruling that it is a move action) to immediately put the candle out, and your DM rules that burning the candle for any length of time during the spell preparation gives the full benefit. Four hours at a rate of one round of usage per spell preparation gives you 2400 non-gate uses before the candle is exhausted.
Chamomile wrote:Grek is a national treasure.
Schleiermacher
Knight-Baron
Posts: 666
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2012 9:39 am

Post by Schleiermacher »

Assuming you mean the spell preparation usage, 4 uses. The cleric must burn the candle while preparing spells, preparing spells takes 1 hour and a candle takes 4 hours to burn down. The waters are muddied because the item description says you can get the effect by burning the candle "just prior to" your spell preparation time, but that's the intent as I understand it.

The Gate usage immediately burns down the candle (and usually the entire campaign).
Korwin
Duke
Posts: 2055
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 6:49 am
Location: Linz / Austria

Post by Korwin »

Lago PARANOIA wrote:If your DM has lost their mind and is letting you use a Candle of Invocation, about how many uses can you get out of it as a cleric?
Unlimited uses?
Red_Rob wrote: I mean, I'm pretty sure the Mayans had a prophecy about what would happen if Frank and PL ever agreed on something. PL will argue with Frank that the sky is blue or grass is green, so when they both separately piss on your idea that is definitely something to think about.
User avatar
Rawbeard
Knight-Baron
Posts: 670
Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 9:45 am

Post by Rawbeard »

you kinda lose the spells when the candle stops burning, getting 4 uses out of it AND benefitting from that is somewhat tricky.
To a man with a hammer every problem looks like a nail.
Schleiermacher
Knight-Baron
Posts: 666
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2012 9:39 am

Post by Schleiermacher »

Yes and no. The description says:
A cleric whose alignment matches the candle’s operates as if two levels higher for purposes of determining spells per day if he burns the candle during or just prior to his spell preparation time. He can even cast spells normally unavailable to him, as if he were of that higher level, but only so long as the candle continues to burn.

As I read it, that means if you burn the candle while preparing spells and then immediately extinguish it, you still gain +2 CL and additional spell slots at all spell levels you already had access to. The only thing you need to keep the candle burning to do is cast spells of a spell level that you don't normally have access to.
User avatar
Ice9
Duke
Posts: 1568
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Ice9 »

To benefit from the higher level spells, you could burn the candle during the last round of your preparation and then keep it burning while you quickly use the normally unavailable spells (on day-long buffs).

Depending on the interpretation of "while preparing spells", that means either three uses or ~800.


Also, this being Pathfinder, you could use Create Greater Demiplane to make a demiplane with the "Timeless" quality, which makes spells with a duration last forever there. While not explicitly stated, there's a decent case for the candle to burn forever on such a plane.
Last edited by Ice9 on Wed Dec 17, 2014 8:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ishy
Duke
Posts: 2404
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 2:59 pm

Post by ishy »

Lago PARANOIA wrote:If your DM has lost their mind and is letting you use a Candle of Invocation, about how many uses can you get out of it as a cleric?
How often could a non-cleric, using UMD to activate the candle, prepare spells as if they were a cleric?
Gary Gygax wrote:The player’s path to role-playing mastery begins with a thorough understanding of the rules of the game
Bigode wrote:I wouldn't normally make that blanket of a suggestion, but you seem to deserve it: scroll through the entire forum, read anything that looks interesting in term of design experience, then come back.
Mask_De_H
Duke
Posts: 1995
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:17 pm

Post by Mask_De_H »

What are good Golarion gods to pick for an Ecclesitheruge? Groteus (Chaos, Darkness, Void, maybe Madness) and Cayden Cailean (Chaos, Charm, Liberation, Strength, Travel) seem pretty money to me. You think a Mister Cavern would let you create your own god with blackjack and hookers?
FrankTrollman wrote: Halfling women, as I'm sure you are aware, combine all the "fun" parts of pedophilia without any of the disturbing, illegal, or immoral parts.
K wrote:That being said, the usefulness of airships for society is still transporting cargo because it's an option that doesn't require a powerful wizard to show up for work on time instead of blowing the day in his harem of extraplanar sex demons/angels.
Chamomile wrote: See, it's because K's belief in leaving generation of individual monsters to GMs makes him Chaotic, whereas Frank's belief in the easier usability of monsters pre-generated by game designers makes him Lawful, and clearly these philosophies are so irreconcilable as to be best represented as fundamentally opposed metaphysical forces.
Whipstitch wrote:You're on a mad quest, dude. I'd sooner bet on Zeus getting bored and letting Sisyphus put down the fucking rock.
Orca
Knight-Baron
Posts: 877
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 1:31 am

Post by Orca »

Sivanah (Knowledge, Madness, Magic, Rune & Trickery, and the PrC Lago keeps mentioning, Veiled Illusionist) is pretty decent.

Any domain which gets a good power and poor spells (like, say, the Animal domain with its AC but the limited usefulness of spells like Calm Animal) would be good. Archives of Nethys can give you a list of which deities get which domains.

As far as designing your own deity goes do you really need to? Golarion has no shortage of options, and Cayden has the blackjack and hookers concept if you like that.
User avatar
TOZ
Duke
Posts: 1159
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 3:19 pm

Post by TOZ »

Crane Wing has been adjusted again. Also, 3.5 reach exception is back in.
Mask_De_H
Duke
Posts: 1995
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:17 pm

Post by Mask_De_H »

Just what I wanted for the holidays: minor rules changes!

So Crane Wing works like Dodge now?
FrankTrollman wrote: Halfling women, as I'm sure you are aware, combine all the "fun" parts of pedophilia without any of the disturbing, illegal, or immoral parts.
K wrote:That being said, the usefulness of airships for society is still transporting cargo because it's an option that doesn't require a powerful wizard to show up for work on time instead of blowing the day in his harem of extraplanar sex demons/angels.
Chamomile wrote: See, it's because K's belief in leaving generation of individual monsters to GMs makes him Chaotic, whereas Frank's belief in the easier usability of monsters pre-generated by game designers makes him Lawful, and clearly these philosophies are so irreconcilable as to be best represented as fundamentally opposed metaphysical forces.
Whipstitch wrote:You're on a mad quest, dude. I'd sooner bet on Zeus getting bored and letting Sisyphus put down the fucking rock.
Post Reply