The Loss of mystique in video game magic

Discussions and debates about video games

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
crasskris
Journeyman
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 6:44 pm
Location: Some hotel somewhere in Germany

The Loss of mystique in video game magic

Post by crasskris »

Nice feature article on the escapist, thought it might interest some of you:

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/article ... Hate-Magic
User avatar
wotmaniac
Knight-Baron
Posts: 888
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 11:40 am
Location: my house

Post by wotmaniac »

It just seems like he's all pissed-off "because fantasy".
He's looking for a level of depth that 99.9% of people could give 2 shits about.
I think that one of the comments hit it on the head with (paraphrasing) "that level of depth is fine for a game about mages; but superfluous in a game that simply happens to have mages".
*WARNING*: I say "fuck" a lot.
"The most patriotic thing you can do as an American is to become filthy, filthy rich."
- Mark Cuban

"Game design has no obligation to cater to people who don’t buy into the premise of the game"

TGD -- skirting the edges of dickfinity since 2003.

Public Service Announcement
User avatar
Foxwarrior
Duke
Posts: 1626
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 8:54 am
Location: RPG City, USA

Post by Foxwarrior »

When I was reading the beginning of the article, I hoped that he had some interesting ideas for ways to incorporate dog-beheading-style rituals.

Sadly, in the end he just asked for spells that were harder to code and animate, and more of those "fight without your equipment" levels.
User avatar
Whipstitch
Prince
Posts: 3660
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:23 pm

Post by Whipstitch »

wotmaniac wrote:"that level of depth is fine for a game about mages; but superfluous in a game that simply happens to have mages".
That and you know, analogies. You tackle religion and mysticism in mass media at your own peril.

I dunno, fuck this guy, pretty much.
Last edited by Whipstitch on Thu Apr 25, 2013 7:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Avoraciopoctules
Overlord
Posts: 8624
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 5:48 pm
Location: Oakland, CA

Post by Avoraciopoctules »

My reaction is basically "Dude, if you want complicated fiddly magic like that just play Age of Wonders, Dominions, or King of Dragon Pass."

Most times I check out an article on the Escapist, I get the feeling they are horrifyingly underexposed to the vast variety of games out there.
Last edited by Avoraciopoctules on Thu Apr 25, 2013 7:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 14757
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Kaelik »

The article seems to be about one third complaining that videogame magic is dull and trite, which I basically agree with, because it is. I mean, most magic in games is insultingly basically the same as shooting a bow. And while you can say that magic shouldn't be better or more complex than that in games that have mages but aren't about mages: 1) Games that are about mages also have boring shitty magic. 2) Any game in which one option for the PC is to be a mage is about mages.

Another third of the article is complaining about shit that is purely cosmetic, and probably not in line with most people's preferences, while I am fine with ice shooting feeling different than fire shooting, the fact of the matter is fuck you, I don't want my magic to be tied to gods if I don't want it to.

And another third is stuff that veers between could be useful as a gimmick in a specific game or could be completely shit as a gameplay mechanic, IE environment base magic is cool, but how do you make that viable in a game in which characters are supposed to explore all the environments? Or, yeah eat a dick I don't want to have to kill people with my bare hands to trigger my blood magic.

Overall, 1/5.
DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.

That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
crasskris
Journeyman
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 6:44 pm
Location: Some hotel somewhere in Germany

Post by crasskris »

Kaelik wrote:IE environment base magic is cool, but how do you make that viable in a game in which characters are supposed to explore all the environments?
Without wanting to necessarily defend the article: it could work, for example, in a FF tactics-like game. Defined tiles with clear position and a probably finite tile set equals a clear understanding of the situation.

Also, environment does not equal nature. Preparing a fight by setting up, I don't know, a runecircle, or summoning spirits that syphon extra energy to you, is a requirement mainly on time, not surroundings. Which is of course something that a lot of games have, but usually with the same simple button push that triggers blasting.

The spirit thing with the symbolic link is also a something that might add to a game. Give a character the power to fuck a target up the spiritual ass with a lock of the target's hair, and suddenly having conmen/thieves in the group makes a lot more sense. Granted, that would be a game with Fallout 1 / 2 levels of freedom, and they don't make those any more.
Last edited by crasskris on Thu Apr 25, 2013 8:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Avoraciopoctules
Overlord
Posts: 8624
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 5:48 pm
Location: Oakland, CA

Post by Avoraciopoctules »

crasskris wrote:Granted, that would be a game with Fallout 1 / 2 levels of freedom, and they don't make those any more.
What about the Wasteland game that got Kickstarted? There might be some pretty open-ended stuff released in the next few years.
crasskris
Journeyman
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 6:44 pm
Location: Some hotel somewhere in Germany

Post by crasskris »

Avoraciopoctules wrote:What about the Wasteland game that got Kickstarted? There might be some pretty open-ended stuff released in the next few years.
Would you leave an old man to his nostalgia-motivated complains about today's youth?

Also, that is my lawn you are standing on. Remove yourself, or I'll call the police!
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 14757
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Kaelik »

Avoraciopoctules wrote:My reaction is basically "Dude, if you want complicated fiddly magic like that just play Age of Wonders, Dominions, or King of Dragon Pass."

Most times I check out an article on the Escapist, I get the feeling they are horrifyingly underexposed to the vast variety of games out there.
I think it is pretty legitimate to say, "man I sure wish I could play a game with complex kickass magic as a single sorcerer who doesn't micromanage and empire and/or a large party of minions."
DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.

That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
crasskris
Journeyman
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 6:44 pm
Location: Some hotel somewhere in Germany

Post by crasskris »

Avoraciopoctules wrote:Most times I check out an article on the Escapist, I get the feeling they are horrifyingly underexposed to the vast variety of games out there.
Yeah, Escapist feature articles oscillate between light-weight, under-researched and haphazardly structured opinion pieces and actual journalism, with a bias towards the former. Many are better at sparking a discussion than providing a solid, well-informed basis for one.
crasskris
Journeyman
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 6:44 pm
Location: Some hotel somewhere in Germany

Post by crasskris »

wotmaniac wrote:I think that one of the comments hit it on the head with (paraphrasing) "that level of depth is fine for a game about mages; but superfluous in a game that simply happens to have mages".
Depends on what your baseline is; sadly the rather bare-bones article provides far to few 'bad' examples.

If you've got a game that happens to have mages, and these mages happen to be a playable class, then a mage should have some depth added to him, if only to differentiate him in a meaningful way from the archer or the flask-throwing alchemist. And different mechanics don't necessarily mean increased complexity. Hell, if you're crafty with cosmetics you probably don't even need that much mechanical differentiation, as long as the class feels different in play.

Of course many games have that to some degree. Some do it better, some do it worse, but one can safely assume that the author is complaining while already enjoying a rather high standard.

EDIT: Also, I think the amount of grind in your game is a defining factor. If you have to fight a hundred or more enemies per hour of play, you definitely want a simple to handle mechanic.

EDIT: And stress. A tactical game would gain from depth, but in an action game it might just needlessly ramp up the difficulty.
Last edited by crasskris on Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:04 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Post Reply