"strip mining" old stuff for future 4E splatbooks
Moderator: Moderators
"strip mining" old stuff for future 4E splatbooks
Last edited by ggroy on Sat Mar 13, 2010 8:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Knight-Baron
- Posts: 948
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
-
- Knight
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2008 9:26 am
- Location: Blighty
I believe that their curent release schedule is based on the assumptions that player takeup is only impeded by a comparitive lack of material. They see it as a quantative issue, not a qualitative problem.
There are observed reasons why someone wouldn't be able to detect the difference in quality and assume that it's only a quantity problem. Quality is not very objectively measurable, but quantity has these convenient numbers (mostly meaningless) that get management off their backs about montising the new edition.
Sales, well... there are a lot of things you can blame a sales slump on other than a drop in quality. Pirates are a popular scapegoat, the MPAA and RIAA have legitimised blaming them for any sales woes you might have. Oh, hey, the economy isn't doing too well!
There are observed reasons why someone wouldn't be able to detect the difference in quality and assume that it's only a quantity problem. Quality is not very objectively measurable, but quantity has these convenient numbers (mostly meaningless) that get management off their backs about montising the new edition.
Sales, well... there are a lot of things you can blame a sales slump on other than a drop in quality. Pirates are a popular scapegoat, the MPAA and RIAA have legitimised blaming them for any sales woes you might have. Oh, hey, the economy isn't doing too well!
Face it. Today will be as bad a day as any other.
-
- Knight-Baron
- Posts: 948
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
-
- Prince
- Posts: 3295
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 4:22 pm
Not to mention that most of their new material is totally useless to existing campaigns and characters. New classes that you have to start out in, feats with crazy ability score prereqs that you wouldn't have unless you specifically built to get that feat, racial feats you can't take unless you're some obscure race/class combo... Honestly it seems like the only time you'd care about 4E splats is if you had to make a new character.SunTzuWarmaster wrote:I don't think the market can support the current release schedule, even if they had 100% of it. It feels like an author that writes more than 1 book/month, and a movie producer that releases 2 movies/week. To the vast majority of audiences, that is just too much material.
At least in 3.5 you could use some of the stuff in the splats on your current character. casters got new spells, fighters could plan to take a feat or two or use one of the new PrCs. There was a reason you may want to buy those books for your existing character.
But 4E... damn... it doesn't seem like it offers much at all to existing characters.
-
- Knight
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2008 9:26 am
- Location: Blighty
I prefer to apply Hanlon's Razor - the dev team think they're putting out good quality work, and see the lower player takeup as being a problem with the amount of available material instead of how good the material is.ggroy wrote:When a product is doing really well in sales, this is probably what leads company executives to think that they can get away with selling "dogshit" masquerading as the product.
I guess they believe that there are more players ready to get into the game that are just waiting for an appropriate character class to become available.RandomCasualty2 wrote:Not to mention that most of their new material is totally useless to existing campaigns and characters. New classes that you have to start out in, feats with crazy ability score prereqs that you wouldn't have unless you specifically built to get that feat, racial feats you can't take unless you're some obscure race/class combo... Honestly it seems like the only time you'd care about 4E splats is if you had to make a new character.
At least in 3.5 you could use some of the stuff in the splats on your current character. casters got new spells, fighters could plan to take a feat or two or use one of the new PrCs. There was a reason you may want to buy those books for your existing character.
But 4E... damn... it doesn't seem like it offers much at all to existing characters.
Face it. Today will be as bad a day as any other.
-
- Duke
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:07 am
Well, they've already stripmined all the art...
..but yeah, I agree with the uselessness of most of the splats. I mean, it seems like they could have made them more useful if the designers weren't obsessed with "every class should have its own extremely limited schtick"
With the exception of every controller, who gets summoning attached for the low, low price of $29.99.
..but yeah, I agree with the uselessness of most of the splats. I mean, it seems like they could have made them more useful if the designers weren't obsessed with "every class should have its own extremely limited schtick"
With the exception of every controller, who gets summoning attached for the low, low price of $29.99.
- Psychic Robot
- Prince
- Posts: 4607
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 10:47 pm
It's frustrating because the entire power design is obviously heavily influenced by 3e splatbooks: "We need fodder, pad the book with spells!"
Count Arioch wrote:I'm not sure how discussions on whether PR is a terrible person or not is on-topic.
Ant wrote:You do not seem to do anything.Chamomile wrote:Ant, what do we do about Psychic Robot?
They'll probably start recycling old campaign settings that 3E skipped, if it comes down to it - Spooky Spooky Land, D&D in SPAAAAAAAACE, My Infinity is Bigger than Your Infinity, It's Always Hot and Dry Outside and so on.
And there are fans of the above settings who hate 3E simply because it didn't support their favourite 2E setting, so those idiots would buy it up instantly. Not that there's enough for it to actually do any good, mind you, but still, they'd have x+y sales instead of just x (where x = people who buy up any shit that WotC produce, and y = old setting fanboys).
And there are fans of the above settings who hate 3E simply because it didn't support their favourite 2E setting, so those idiots would buy it up instantly. Not that there's enough for it to actually do any good, mind you, but still, they'd have x+y sales instead of just x (where x = people who buy up any shit that WotC produce, and y = old setting fanboys).
Count Arioch the 28th wrote:There is NOTHING better than lesbians. Lesbians make everything better.
They mentioned plans to publish novels set in IAHDO. No word about any supplements as of yet, though. The previous incarnation was just an ad for XPH, so I don't hope for the next one to be anything worth reading. They'd just press the reset button once again to be able to use new content, yay! No thanks, I don't want emo retards and FYIADs fucking up the awesome world of scheming Templars and would-be avangion Preservers.Koumei wrote:It's Always Hot and Dry Outside
Actually I was the exact opposite. I sort of didn't hate 3E because they didn't support my favorite 2E setting, which really was a crappy conversion of their 1E setting which really was, come to think of it, really crappy and I ignored most of the crap.Koumei wrote:And there are fans of the above settings who hate 3E simply because it didn't support their favourite 2E setting, so those idiots would buy it up instantly.
That setting, btw, was Lankhmar.
Gotta reroll to use the new FotM builds! That's content! Learn2play.RandomCasualty2 wrote:Not to mention that most of their new material is totally useless to existing campaigns and characters. New classes that you have to start out in, feats with crazy ability score prereqs that you wouldn't have unless you specifically built to get that feat, racial feats you can't take unless you're some obscure race/class combo... Honestly it seems like the only time you'd care about 4E splats is if you had to make a new character.SunTzuWarmaster wrote:I don't think the market can support the current release schedule, even if they had 100% of it. It feels like an author that writes more than 1 book/month, and a movie producer that releases 2 movies/week. To the vast majority of audiences, that is just too much material.
At least in 3.5 you could use some of the stuff in the splats on your current character. casters got new spells, fighters could plan to take a feat or two or use one of the new PrCs. There was a reason you may want to buy those books for your existing character.
But 4E... damn... it doesn't seem like it offers much at all to existing characters.
Draco_Argentum wrote:Can someone tell it to stop using its teeth please?Mister_Sinister wrote:Clearly, your cock is part of the big barrel the server's busy sucking on.
Juton wrote:Damn, I thought [Pathfailure] accidentally created a feat worth taking, my mistake.
Koumei wrote:Shad, please just punch yourself in the face until you are too dizzy to type. I would greatly appreciate that.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type I - doing exactly the opposite of what they said they would do.Kaelik wrote:No, bad liar. Stop lying.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type II - change for the sake of change.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type III - the illusion of change.
- Ganbare Gincun
- Duke
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:42 am