The Gaming Den

darn... I really want to know what that was...

1. Honestly, the moaning about "it's not D&D!" is ridiculous. This marketing is to get people excited about 5e. And the way that happens is with publicity--the facebook app is a good idea, ads in magazines are a good idea, comics are a good idea because they ALL GET THE WORD OUT. When ...

I never thought of it that way... that gives the opportunity for all sorts of mobs screaming about the morality of killing a pokemon every time you send it back into its ball... woah.

damn, that works perfectly. In other news, can the book bomb be combined with something like secret page ? I never understood Frank's schpeal about wizard's having their whole spellbook on one page or whatever that was... but if I remember it correctly, you could put all your explosive runes on one ...

WABARGL PHYSICS IS IMPOARTANT SHUTUP

The idea is that you want good mobility. Mage hand will give you 15 feet, and your animal can travel like 20 ft in a round. If they're sitting next to you at the beginning of battle, you get a 35' range... which is decent. But I'd like something higher.

well, WBL-wise, you can only get a Ring of Telekinesis at 12th level. It also seems like a moderate magical item from BoG.

Maybe fold them all into paper airplanes? I'm sure there's a cantrip for that.

before you leave to do SC things, would you mind giving a rough idea of what "Surprise" and "Detecting Traps" are?

Kaelik wrote:

For Valor wrote:Question: What book is Wings of Flurry in?

Dragon Cock

k thanks

shadzar... there are some things we need to go over. Let me address your points in order: 1) All right, your point here is that "If you sell the name D&D, you're not actually going to get any product". You are wrong. Selling D&D's name means more people think about it and talk abou...

Question: What book is Wings of Flurry in?

Bihlbo wrote:

Kaelik wrote:Here is/was the plan:

Since the class is 70% Yugi Oh (no reason to read further)

I take it back, this class sucks.

Haters gonne hate....

well, Ice9, a rogue isn't dumb enough to flank at level 15, but I see what you're thinking of here. At low levels, where flanking is actually used to get SA damage, this mechanic would be quite useful. I think it would need to be balanced by a greater repercussion if the guy in the barbarian's spot ...

It's not a false dichotomy. There's no choice, just an opinion dressed up as a fact.

Oh. I see.

Bihlbo wrote:I just talked my GM into letting me play this class. One question: am I better off using divine metamagic or master of many forms 3?

... That IS a joke, right?

What does it mean to get someone in the sack?

... Into the sack?

Kaelik wrote: Wizard 1/Cleric 1/Ninja 1/Rogue 1/Fighter 1/Barbarian 1/Samurai 1/Sex Robot 1

is totally viable.

Doesn't this tie in a little with K's talk about people wanting to be their archtype now and not later?

This is a very "mother may I" kind of game...

So what's the general consensus on the powers? We need to figure those out.

Well Sinbad was fictiona--

... waaaaaitasecond.

FrankTrollman wrote:Can I buy pot from you?

-Username17

For Valor Likes this.

If a rogue can catch an opponent when he is unable to defend himself effectively from her attack, she can strike a vital spot for extra damage. The rogue’s attack deals extra damage any time her target would be denied a Dexterity bonus to AC (whether the target actually has a Dexterity bonus or not)...

Make them part of sneak attack. The rogue should be able to sneak attack anything from level 1, because doing it any other way is dumb. Also, the damage progression is too much, especially with a TWF rogue. If there is any way to say "no TWF, better damage progression" I would be in favor ...

10 is too much, Zine. It's like, 9 more than I want to deal with.