The Gaming Den

I'm pretty happy right now :biggrin: After my breakup four years ago, I didn't have any partners. Recently, two poly pairs have invited me (separately) in their dynamics as secondary, which is a lot of fun. Not the same as being in a monogamous relationship or the primary in a poly relationship, bu...

I'm pretty happy right now :biggrin: After my breakup four years ago, I didn't have any partners. Recently, two poly pairs have invited me (separately) in their dynamics as secondary, which is a lot of fun. Not the same as being in a monogamous relationship or the primary in a poly relationship, bu...

@all:
Makes sense, I'm convinced.
Thank you!

I'm not a native speaker, so I may assume more rigidity then is actually there. Can you show me one other instance in the english language where the word within is used as you describe - something that just starts within a certain time frame - without using the words "begins, starts" (or o...

Yes, but casting it from the 1st to the 100th round means that you didn't cast it "within" one round - it's nitpicky, but we're talking about RAW, not RAI: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/de/worterbuch/englisch/within The sentence you quoted doesn't say anything about the usual targeting ...

Spells that break general rules usually do say so - for example, Nerve Skitter explicitly says that it can be cast flat-footed, unlike other immediate action spells. The Planar binding line doesn't say so - instead, it explicitly lists a "Target:" line, which implies the targeting rules a...

Spells that break general rules usually do say so - for example, Nerve Skitter explicitly says that it can be cast flat-footed, unlike other immediate action spells. The Planar binding line doesn't say so - instead, it explicitly lists a "Target:" line, which implies the targeting rules ar...

Actually, the RAW wording of Planar Binding in 3.5 was no better - it is also non-functional. You need to back that up. From what I remember, the rules where all over the book (looking at inversed magical circle) and you wanted to have high charisma. But they where functional. 1) The Planar Binding...

Actually, the RAW wording of Planar Binding in 3.5 was no better - it is also non-functional.

@Stahlseele:
You need to do a tax declaration.
Here's a somewhat recent thread from somebody in Germany with a similar problem: https://forum.elster.de/anwenderforum/f ... ur%C3%BCck

The paladin spell table on page 49 is laid out so it lays over rules text. I haven't looked at the whole tome, maybe this problem exists with other tables, too.

a) Depends on the nature of the support, I guess? Also, if you can afford it. I think it takes a year or 3 for a new business to start making money, so... b) It will make all of those questions about "why did you leave your last job?" interesting. c) Much easier to look for a job while yo...

The small team I lead at work is going to be dissolved. My bosses offered me three options: a) They support me in starting my own franchise (we're in a consulting franchise) b) They fire me, and I get unemployment benefits c) They employ me for a few months more, and I search for a job during that t...

I don't have the original calculations available anymore - I debated them here (http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?174987-Spellcaster-Magic-Immunity-3-5) and did the original calculation here: (http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19864558/Playing_the_unbeatable_wizard?pg=1)....

What? Why would the weight matter? It weighs as much as a cloth cone weighs while shrunk. Nope, it just has the composition of one: You are able to shrink one nonmagical item (if it is within the size limit) to 1/16 of its normal size in each dimension ( to about 1/4,000 the original volume and mas...

How about the Wizard's Hat/Tinfoil Hat defense? Antimagic Field is dangerous, but can be defeated with a bit of prep. You get a tall metal cone, big enough to stand in. Then you cast Shrink Item on it, turning it into a cloth cone which you wear as a hat. When you enter an AMF, it snaps back to ful...

Soo... In one of those pairs, I got feelings not only for the girl, but also the guy (I didn't realize/know I was bisexual before). He isn't interested in pursuing anything sexual, but his roommate is. The roommate is cute, adorably good-natured and basically what I look for in partners. However, h...

He means your effective WBL, but Pathfinder designers say they like CWI making it double as long as it is your own wealth by level (not your allies). Actually, they recommend that characters with item creation feats get 25 to 50% more wealth: Adjusting Character Wealth by Level You can take advanta...

As I have previously pointed out. The rules for Creature Sizes say 64ft or more. There are no rules that indicate that the Creature Size rules apply to item sizes, so there are no rules saying that Objects larger than 64ft are Colossal. It's kind of stupid, but in the PHB "Guidelines and gloss...

Will definitely go to the doctor for this, would appreciate advice on what kind of specialist to visit. I'm currently considering a urologist - is there some better choice? Saturday, a play partner used nipple clamps on me, and some liquid came out of my nipples (first white-ish, then clear). I got ...

Bump, and more specific questions/information: I need help/a refresher creating a Shadowrun 3rd ed character Rules: all 3rd ed rule books allowed max availability of items is 8 No self-designed spells, vehicles Beta-Cyberware, cultured Bioware available, but only legal ones for characters who had a ...

Not exactly one annoying question, but I figured here's the best place to ask (didn't find anything useful on Dumpshock or Reddit): What general principles should I keep in mind to get an optimal result in character creation in Shadowrun 3e? Are there any trap options? What are some strong choices, ...

Count Arioch the 28th wrote:It's more of a choker because having a job is pretty important to my life right now. Most normies wouldn't realize what it was.

Yep, congrats. That's awesome

You haven't run into monsters that just do damage? No hobgoblins, skeletons, giants, animals, nothing? Because thats... seriously the majority of 5e monsters. They just pop up out the tall grass and try to rip people's faces off... they close to melee, do a random amount of damage unrelated to thei...

Then why the fuck even bring your nitpicky shit up? Cause you seemed knowledgable and I was interested in a discussion - maybe glean some insight from it, since in my current group (5e, level 3) we do have a moon druid, but since we're new to 5e, the DM would permit switching - and the druid player...